General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court Says NO
on Joy Reid
Denies request to the felon!!! HE WILL ALWAYS BE A CONVICTED FELON!!!!!!!
Hmm... could it be a parting gift from Jimmy to the felon????
LeftInTX
(31,266 posts)indeed!!!!!
Scubamatt
(99 posts)the complicit media is steadfastly ignoring orange man's call with Alito, and how Alito of course voted in favor of granting the petition? This is one of the most corrupt Supreme Court's since Buchanan reached out directly to Justices Catron and Grier in 1858 telling them to go beyond the particulars of th Dred Scott case and issue a decision legitimizing slavery throughout the United States.
Cha
(306,188 posts)Cha
(306,188 posts)Mump Specifically ordered to SHUT IT DOWN.
What were they thinking?~ The Dic has Spoken!
CatWoman
(79,804 posts)Cha
(306,188 posts)And Amy C Barrett... what got into her? same thing?
TY
with the good side other times.
Cha
(306,188 posts)Attilatheblond
(4,855 posts)Looking deep into the Roberts Court and we will see corruption there is not new, and involves more than just Alito, Thomas, and The Beer Guy.
sheshe2
(88,625 posts)Dayum, that is good news and frankly unexpected.
sheshe2, reported on Joy Reid.
sheshe2
(88,625 posts)Boom. A convicted felon for ever more.
bdamomma
(66,937 posts)Geez the SC got a spine.
sheshe2
(88,625 posts)Cha
(306,188 posts)This is Unheard of... I saw that Mump had taken it to the SC and thought... well there goes that. SIGH!
Mahalo, bdamomma~
sheshe2
(88,625 posts)Amy Coney Barrett shocked me. Maybe she is not a complete Handmaiden.
IzzaNuDay
(743 posts)but hope at least the 5 justices voting are protected from the dotards retribution. But then, if the dotard does try to retaliate after Jan 20, the SCOTUS may have to reconsider that previous immunity verdict. Betcha they didnt think of that scenario!
Attilatheblond
(4,855 posts)Could be tired of being taken for granted. Maybe even seeing the horrible results of her working on the case for W Bush to get the FL recount stopped in 2020. A LOT of very bad things resulted from that hand-over of the presidency to Dick Cheney.
dflprincess
(28,583 posts)Barrett & Robert's joining the liberals.
Roberts starting to get the message?
yourout
(8,173 posts)mountain grammy
(27,441 posts)kentuck
(113,030 posts)That is good information to know.
Volaris
(10,684 posts)This is an easy one that he can use for credibility cover, so when he votes to overturn Obergefell, he can claim he's just calling balls and strikes again.
ColinC
(11,077 posts)Not sure why given his drunken senate committee tirade, but he seemed to be well respected academically which led me to think his opinions would also be more respectable. Whatever...
forgotmylogin
(7,702 posts)I know her politics don't align with ours, but I'm impressed she seems to be a neutral jurist, and doesn't seem completely in anyone's pocket. Similar to Roberts who can be infuriating but seems to at least consider what side of the scale he comes down on from time to time.
I'm tired of holding out hope, but it's a fantasy that if/when Cannon gets appointed to the SC that Barrett might slap some sense into her.
ColinC
(11,077 posts)jls4561
(1,639 posts)malaise
(279,573 posts)Rec. Rec. Rec
But sadly it won't keep him out of office.
elleng
(137,290 posts)Chief and Amy C-B in MAJORITY!!!
LeftInTX
(31,266 posts)Of course, he can probably transfer it to someone else.
sheshe2
(88,625 posts)canetoad
(18,405 posts)A divided Supreme Court refused to delay Donald Trumps sentencing in his hush money case, clearing the way for the president-elect to face judgment in a New York courtroom on Friday and to be formally classified as a felon before he returns to the White House.
Trump turned to the Supreme Court in a last-ditch effort to stop the hearing, citing the conservative majoritys explosive opinion in July that granted him and other former presidents immunity from criminal prosecution for their official acts.
He is set to be sentenced Friday, after a jury convicted him of 34 counts of falsifying business records related to a hush money payment made to an adult-film actress during the 2016 election. New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, who presided over Trumps trial, has said he does not plan to give the incoming president jail time or probation.
But the completion of the sentencing hearing would formalize Trumps status as the first former president or president-elect convicted of criminal wrongdoing a designation Trump had hoped to avoid.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/09/trump-sentencing-supreme-court-new/
archive: https://archive.md/cUVEn
sheshe2
(88,625 posts)canetoad
(18,405 posts)Trump makes history!
sheshe2
(88,625 posts)He actually had a three-fer. Two courts ruled against him and he had to sit through President Carters funeral and have President Biden direct part of the eulogy straight at him. That part was about divisiveness and hate, perfect.
My header was... btw.
Cha
(306,188 posts)we were so Happy because he would not have any time in Prison.
Well there it is!.. Plus it makes Mump Very UNHAPPY.
He wanted it to Go Down the Rabbit Hole... No Can Do.. says the Majority of the SC.
Can't go higher than that.
PS.... Karma can be a *****... this is for Acting out at Pres Carter's Memorial.. him and his Lump.
He'll Always have that Asterisk *
Let the convicted felon's temper tantrum begin.
bucolic_frolic
(47,946 posts)ProudMNDemocrat
(19,264 posts)CONVICTED FELON will forever be attributed to tRump. It's on his record forever.
Irish_Dem
(61,009 posts)Mad_Machine76
(24,798 posts)Who should have recused himself JMHO
Irish_Dem
(61,009 posts)madinmaryland
(65,235 posts)Its going to be a red mess at Mar-a-Lardass tonight!
Beachnutt
(8,241 posts)if so how does that play out ?
Mad_Machine76
(24,798 posts)But for now
DallasNE
(7,619 posts)But my understanding is that Trump can (and will) appeal but the appeal cannot overturn the jury verdict. The appeal can only be based on errors by the Judge - by applying the wrong law, etc. That could result in a new trial being ordered. This is the likely route Trump will take.
brakester
(171 posts)that can be imagined!
He's holding on like an angry badger! 🦡
DallasNE
(7,619 posts)Trump went running to Alito.
https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=19883202
brakester
(171 posts)n/a
aggiesal
(9,589 posts)Pendejo45 will complain about SCOTUS in 5...4...3...2...
He will claim that SCOTUS is corrupt.
ancianita
(39,079 posts)Auggie
(31,967 posts)sheshe2
(88,625 posts)FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON FELON
liberalla
(10,136 posts)It's about time!
ancianita
(39,079 posts)WHAT IS AN UNCONDITIONAL DISCHARGE?
An unconditional discharge, as Trump is likely to get, can be imposed under New York state law when the court is of the opinion that no proper purpose would be served by imposing any condition upon the defendant's release. When a defendant is given an unconditional discharge, the court will have to give its reason for doing so, and the defendant is released without imprisonment, fine or probation supervision, according to New York law...
WHAT CANT TRUMP DO AS A CONVICTED FELON?
Convicted felons face a number of restrictions, though many of them are unlikely to apply to Trump, like holding state public office. Trump will not be able to serve on a jury or own a firearm, and most notably, many countries have travel restrictions that bar convicted felons from entering, which means that as president he may have to get special permission for some travels. That wouldnt be a first, as CBS News notes President George W. Bush had to get a waiver to travel to Canada as president because he previously pleaded guilty to drunk driving. More than a dozen countries have such restrictions in place, including Australia, Canada, China, Japan and the United Kingdom.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/01/09/what-to-expect-from-trumps-hush-money-sentencing-tomorrow-as-supreme-court-refuses-to-stop-it/
Countries restricting him will likely restrict sharing their Five Eyes intelligence with him.
LeftInTX
(31,266 posts)ancianita
(39,079 posts)Pretty sure we all knew about his DUI, though, just not the Canada thing. A few thoughts...
The Felon Prez will never live this sentencing down. It will also taint his rethug loyalists.
We also will likely see corp media double down on sane washing the Felon President's second term.
As for him, he won't allow any but Fox in the WH Press Room anyway -- if he even has a press secretary -- no one will get to report without his pre-approval.
Teacher of the Year
(172 posts)FOX would start every story about them with that fact.
ancianita
(39,079 posts)Links to House and Senate reps' call lines. Many of us make calls. They answer, take notes, pass them on to your congress person
Write down exactly the House/Senate bill you're calling about, and exactly the position you want them to take. Give facts and sources. They listen. Each call will take 10 minutes of your day.
https://directory.house.gov/#!/
https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm
brakester
(171 posts)NOT as a
WAR CRIMINAL
republianmushroom
(18,451 posts)You can put lip stick on a pig but it still is a pig and trump will forever be a felon.
BidenRocks
(1,002 posts)to Let It Be.
What a day.
malaise
(279,573 posts)😀
malaise
(279,573 posts)😂🥹🥹
LAS14
(14,861 posts)I've figured Alito and Thomas are totally evil. But I'd hoped Kavanaugh on Gorsuch might, on occasion, vote againt totally invalid claims. I guess not.
BComplex
(9,184 posts)They should have been impeached.
Sancho
(9,110 posts)dchill
(40,911 posts)ShazzieB
(19,074 posts)"Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Kavanaugh would grant the application.."
It just figures those 4 would have given him what he wanted, doesn't it? SO GLAD Barrett and Roberts decided not to go along with it!
reACTIONary
(6,198 posts)... This was a denial of a stay for sentencing, not a final appeal to the Supreme Court. After sentencing, he can appeal through the state Court system. Convicted felon? Yes. Forever? That is still not a done deal.
Disaffected
(5,230 posts)"For he's a jolly good felon,
For he's a jolly good felon,
For he's a jolly good felon,
That nobody can deny, "
etc.
LetMyPeopleVote
(156,447 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(156,447 posts)I am happy that trump is not above the law. The briefs filed by trump's counsel were really sad and ridiculous. Basically it was the position of trump and his attorneys that trump was totally above the law
Link to tweet
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/09/politics/supreme-court-donald-trump-sentencing
The high court on Thursday rejected Trumps emergency request to delay the proceeding, setting the stage for him to be sentenced just days before he is inaugurated on January 20 for a second term.
Four conservative justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh said they would have granted Trumps request. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the courts three liberals to side against Trump.
Judge Juan Merchan, the New York judge who oversaw Trumps trial, had ordered sentencing in the case for Friday morning but has signaled that Trump will face neither penalties nor prison time.
The sentencing hearing is scheduled for Friday at 9:30 a.m.
In a brief, one-paragraph statement, the court said that some of Trumps concerns could be handled in the ordinary course on appeal. The court also reasoned that the burden sentencing would impose on Trumps responsibilities is relatively insubstantial in light of the trial courts stated intent to impose no penalty.
The fact that trump was so desperate to avoid being sentence makes me happy about this ruling
LetMyPeopleVote
(156,447 posts)This makes me smile
Link to tweet
Reporters, myself included, are wondering whether this telegraphs that Justice Merchan has some words for Donald Trump that he wants the world to hear...
Boomerproud
(8,536 posts)It better be the unfurnished truth.
underpants
(187,772 posts)Iggo
(48,654 posts)The thinking is that Merchan set it up that way so tfg couldnt show harm.
iluvtennis
(20,981 posts)usaf-vet
(7,110 posts)Takket
(22,708 posts)he'll be sentenced in absencia and at some point during his presidency the appeal to SCOTUS of the conviction, based on the "official acts being immune" ruling will lead to the whole thing being thrown out by SCOTUS. Either ACB or Roberts, or both, will switch sides for that ruling.
Locutusofborg
(546 posts)That there hearing would be virtual was decided weeks ago.
orangecrush
(22,294 posts)He wiped his ass with 34 felonies.
This is why you see so many rushing to kiss his ass.
America is over.
Martin68
(24,819 posts)gab13by13
(25,666 posts)but Trump will surely appeal his conviction to the Supreme Court and seeing as Hope Hicks testified at the trial and she worked in the Oval office, it gives the SC and excuse to overturn the conviction.
Amy won't buck Trump a 2nd time.