Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBail-Out Is Out, Bail-In Is In
Bail-Out Is Out, Bail-In Is In
Posted on Apr 30, 2013
By Ellen Brown, Web of Debt
This piece first appeared at Web of Debt.
With Cyprus . . . the game itself changed. By raiding the depositors accounts, a major central bank has gone where they would not previously have dared. The Rubicon has been crossed.
Eric Sprott, Shree Kargutkar, Caveat Depositor
The crossing of the Rubicon into the confiscation of depositor funds was not a one-off emergency measure limited to Cyprus. Similar bail-in policies are now appearing in multiple countries. (See my earlier articles here.) What triggered the new rules may have been a series of game-changing events including the refusal of Iceland to bail out its banks and their depositors; Bank of Americas commingling of its ominously risky derivatives arm with its depository arm over the objections of the FDIC; and the fact that most EU banks are now insolvent. A crisis in a major nation such as Spain or Italy could lead to a chain of defaults beyond anyones control, and beyond the ability of federal deposit insurance schemes to reimburse depositors.
The new rules for keeping the too-big-to-fail banks alive: use creditor funds, including uninsured deposits, to recapitalize failing banks.
But isnt that theft?
Perhaps, but its legal theft. By law, when you put your money into a deposit account, your money becomes the property of the bank. You become an unsecured creditor with a claim against the bank. Before the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was instituted in 1934, U.S. depositors routinely lost their money when banks went bankrupt. Your deposits are protected only up to the $250,000 insurance limit, and only to the extent that the FDIC has the money to cover deposit claims or can come up with it. .....................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/bail-out_is_out_bail-in_is_in_20130430/?ln
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Bail-Out Is Out, Bail-In Is In (Original Post)
marmar
Apr 2013
OP
MisterP
(23,730 posts)1. bipartisan to-axe list:
1 high-speed rail, especially where it's wanted, needed, and a good idea
2 Glass-Steagall
3 USPS
4 Medicare
5 Social Security
6 FDIC
and your choices are a guy who promises to end the New Deal and a guy who praises it but will axe it because nobody will complain when they're the one doing it
Addison
(299 posts)2. Money in the bank
I don't have much money in the bank, but that hardly matters -- if the FDIC ultimately can't bail out insolvent banks, and those banks run off with their customers' deposits, we'll all be paddle-less up you know what creek.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)3. Thanks for this one.
Precarious situation? Bad smell to it.
Our New Deal is Homeland Security which kind of fits considering the major fleecing in progress.