Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(149,250 posts)
Fri Feb 7, 2025, 04:37 PM Feb 7

Judge in Boston to consider latest bid to block Trump's birthright citizenship order

Source: PBS News Hour/AP

Feb 7, 2025 10:27 AM EST


BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge in Boston on Friday will consider a request from 18 state attorneys general to block President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship for the children of parents who are in the U.S. illegally. The hearing comes after a federal judge in Seattle blocked the order Thursday and decried what he described as the administration’s treatment of the Constitution, saying Trump was trying to change it with an executive order.

The Seattle ruling in a lawsuit brought by four states and an immigrant rights group followed one by a Maryland federal judge, who on Wednesday issued a nationwide pause on the order in a separate but similar case. In the Boston case, the state attorneys general, along with the cities of San Francisco and Washington, are asking Judge Leo Sorokin to issue a preliminary injunction.

They argue that the principle of birthright citizenship is “enshrined in the Constitution” and that Trump does not have the authority to issue the order, which they called a “flagrantly unlawful attempt to strip hundreds of thousands of American-born children of their citizenship based on their parentage.” They also say Trump’s order would cost states funding they rely on to “provide essential services” — from foster care to health care for low-income children to “early interventions for infants, toddlers, and students with disabilities.”

At the heart of the lawsuits is the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868 after the Civil War and the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision, which held that Scott, an enslaved man, wasn’t a citizen despite having lived in a state where slavery was outlawed.

Read more: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/judge-in-boston-to-consider-latest-bid-to-block-trumps-birthright-citizenship-order



This is a 3rd "Birthright Citizenship" case.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge in Boston to consider latest bid to block Trump's birthright citizenship order (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Feb 7 OP
Consider? Read the fucking Constitution, there is nothing to consider. JohnSJ Feb 7 #1
I think that term is used as an old-fashioned style sheet thing BumRushDaShow Feb 7 #2
I understand BRDS, I am just blowing off steam. Thanks JohnSJ Feb 7 #3
I know BumRushDaShow Feb 7 #4
Blistering statement from the American Bar Association on Birthright Citizenship LetMyPeopleVote Feb 11 #5

BumRushDaShow

(149,250 posts)
2. I think that term is used as an old-fashioned style sheet thing
Fri Feb 7, 2025, 05:11 PM
Feb 7

as a synonym for "will review" or "will look at" (in terms of accepting a case).

LetMyPeopleVote

(160,205 posts)
5. Blistering statement from the American Bar Association on Birthright Citizenship
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 09:46 PM
Feb 11


In a blistering statement, the American Bar Association describes "attacks on constitutionally protected birthright citizenship, the dismantling of USAID and the attempts to criminalize" diversity initiatives as "wide-scale affronts to the rule of law itself."


Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge in Boston to consid...