Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jose Garcia

(3,106 posts)
Fri Feb 7, 2025, 11:39 PM Feb 7

Judge won't block DOGE from accessing Labor Department systems

Source: The Hill

A federal judge Friday evening refused to block the Labor Department from giving Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) access to confidential systems or firing employees for refusing to hand over the credentials.

U.S. District Judge John Bates found the plaintiffs hadn’t show enough injury to have legal standing to bring the lawsuit.

“This data includes the medical and financial records of millions of Americans,” wrote Bates. “But on the current record, plaintiffs have failed to establish standing. So although the Court harbors concerns about defendants’ alleged conduct, it must deny plaintiffs’ motion at this time.”

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday by the AFL-CIO and several of its affiliate government employee unions, claims that giving Musk’s team access to the Labor Department systems violates federal privacy law and is without any legal authority.

Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5134001-judge-doge-labor-department-access/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Daleuhlmann

(459 posts)
2. Cowardly, Outrageous Decision!
Sat Feb 8, 2025, 01:28 AM
Feb 8

American workers' privacy is being compromised, you fool in a black robe! How is that not injury enough?

Angrybob2001

(49 posts)
11. Clearance doesn't mean you are an employee
Sun Feb 9, 2025, 07:44 AM
Feb 9

It just means they have gone through a background check appropriate to the level of information they could potentially have access too. Just like the contracted cleaning staff, researchers studying some military history data and vendor equipment maintenance staff as a few examples. Personally I'm pretty sure a 19yo kid who has previously been suspected of stealing data shouldn't have a clearance.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge won't block DOGE fr...