A proposal to tax the uber-rich is gaining traction. But there are skeptics
https://www.npr.org/2024/08/06/nx-s1-5064662/global-wealth-tax-g20-poverty-climate-changeAUGUST 6, 20245:00 AM ET
By Patrick Wood, Kathryn Fink, Scott Detrow
[...]
Now, the Brazilian government has a new proposal: a 2% global wealth tax on the uber-rich. It would impact the 3,000 wealthiest people in the world.
And while 2% might not sound like much, consider how little billionaires are paying in taxes right now: something like 0.3% of their wealth, according to a new report commissioned by the G20.
Economists say creating a 2% tax minimum would unlock an extra $250 billion per year, which could go toward addressing a number of issues, like climate change or global poverty.
But theres a question of feasibility. How do you coordinate a global tax especially when key countries like the United States are saying theyre not on board?
[...]
EYESORE 9001
(27,517 posts)The proponent of this plan mentions coordination among all nations - and I understand many nations wont sign on - but enforcement is another. The shitweasels among those 200 billionaires would get busy hiding assets, so an infrastructure of financial surveillance must try to keep up with their maneuvering.
AllaN01Bear
(23,047 posts)this is a big deal. i am testimony to that if you goto school hungry, you cant learn. i was also a grouch.
ca has one too also.
Igel
(36,086 posts)They have a special tax on incomes over $1M. That's an income tax.
Brasil's proposing a wealth tax. You have $2B in real estate just sitting there because you like visiting it once a year but make $50k/year in income--you'd pay an income tax on the $50k income and a 2% tax on the $2B non-income possessions.
Did a quick calculation. I'm paying around 9% of my annual income in income tax (plus FICA, unemployment insurance, property tax, sales tax, etc.) but all told around paid 0.70% of my income for f/y 2023 + "wealth"--mostly in the form of a house and retirement accounts.