Donald Trump can't get any attack to stick to Kamala Harris

[marmar]

Donald Trump can't get any attack to stick to Kamala Harris
There is a reason why Trump's Cold War callback is falling flat

By Chauncey DeVega
Senior Writer
Published September 10, 2024 6:00AM (EDT)


(Salon) Donald Trump is attacking Kamala Harris like it is the 1950s. He and his mouthpieces — most notably his vice-presidential running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance — are effectively arguing that the vice president, like other women, should know that her rightful place is in the home and not in the Oval Office.

....(snip)....

Trump, groping for effective avenues of attack and vulnerability against Kamala Harris, is now calling her a “Commie”, a “Marxist” and “Comrade Kamala,” falsely claiming that she wants to impose “Soviet-style price controls” on the American people. It is as though his mentor Roy Cohn, who was instrumental in the 1950s Red Scare, has been reanimated as a type of ghost who is advising the corrupt ex-president from beyond the grave.

In a sharp new essay at CNN, Stephen Collinson describes Trump’s strategy against Harris as his “feral political offensive.” Trump is not interested in winning the election against Harris based on policy but instead on attacking her humanity and personhood. The Washington Post details the logic behind Trump’s feral offensive:

With little chance of improving Trump’s standing, Trump’s advisers see the only option as damaging hers.

“What matters is their ability to prosecute a case to the point where she feels like she needs to answer questions and that she’s on defense,” said Josh Holmes, a prominent GOP consultant. “I think it’s a serious paper tiger we’re dealing with here. I don’t think for 60 days they can keep the train on the tracks.”

Republicans have already started pummeling Harris with attack ads. The bulk of television spending by the campaigns and their allied super PACs between Aug. 23 and Aug. 29 — 57 percent — were attacks on Harris, according to data from the media-tracking company AdImpact. Twenty-one percent were pro-Harris ads that drew a contrast with Trump, and another 14 percent were purely positive about Harris, the data showed. Only 8 percent were anti-Trump attack ads.

“This is a moment in the message arc of us seeking to define her, she’s seeking to define herself,” a Trump adviser said. “We have a defined candidate — everyone knows everything about the person. There’s lots of new information about Kamala Harris that people just don’t know.”

As another adviser told reporters last month: “If you think this race is going to be decided on likability, you’re making a grave error because neither one of them is going to be liked at the end of this race.”

....(snip)....

Attacking Harris as a “communist” or “socialist” also has deep roots in how African-American political leaders such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. had their reputations and political projects impugned and undermined by the country’s news media and political class (and as part of a concerted effort of sabotage and infiltration by the FBI and other law enforcement known as COINTELPRO). In that way, attacking Harris as a communist or socialist or “big city San Francisco liberal” is an attempt to trigger white racial resentment and white rage that Black people are inherently un-American and unpatriotic, seeking to take money away from “the makers” (white people) and give it to “the takers” (undeserving, lazy Black and brown people). .................(more)

https://www.salon.com/2024/09/10/donald-cant-get-any-to-stick-to-kamala-harris/

[bucolic_frolic]

1. She is unassailable because she is so articulate, clear, rational, with such good judgment

Trump is being forced to stand on his own .... get this .... record.

[Joe Cool]

2. She's a prosecutor, he's legally a rapist/felon/fraud

Sure, let's make it about one's image.

[Sugarcoated]

3. They tried that with Obama

It didn't work because we could see President Obama on TV with our own eyes. The same is the case with Harris, Walz as well