They look like Harris ads. Trump backers bought them.

[mahatmakanejeeves]

Tech Brief
They look like Harris ads. Trump backers bought them.

Analysis by Will Oremus and Trisha Thadani
October 30, 2024 at 9:10 a.m. EDT

Happy Wednesday! Apple Intelligence is going just great. Send news tips to: [e-mail].

Post by @geoffreyfowler

View on Threads

Post by @mikemadden

View on Threads

They look like Harris ads. Trump backers bought them.

A pro-Trump organization partly funded by Elon Musk has ramped up a campaign of misleading Facebook ads, posing as a pro-Harris group called “Progress 2028” to present false claims about the Democratic candidate’s platform.

“Progress 2028” has placed 13 different ads on the social network in October, 11 within the past week, according to Meta’s political ad library. Collectively, they have been viewed millions of times by users in swing states. The ads are designed to look like they support the Harris campaign but tout controversial policy stances she doesn’t endorse. They include ensuring undocumented immigrants can vote and receive Medicare benefits, instituting mandatory gun buybacks, and banning fracking. “Drop a comment to thank Kamala,” the ads say.

Behind the ads is a group called Building America’s Future, which receives significant funding from Musk.


An ad paid for by Progress 2028 that deceptively conveys Kamala Harris as a candidate that supports a fracking ban. (Washington Post illustration; Meta Ad Library)

Open Secrets has reported that Progress 2028 — a name that calls to mind a left-wing version of the conservative political initiative Project 2025 — was registered as a fictitious name with the state of Virginia in September by Building America’s Future, a political organization. The tech blog 404 Media reported Tuesday on the group’s expanded campaign of “Progress 2028” Facebook ads.

{snip}

By Will Oremus
Will Oremus writes about the ideas, products and power struggles shaping the digital world for The Washington Post. Before joining The Post in 2021, he spent eight years as Slate's senior technology writer and two years as a senior writer for OneZero at Medium. follow on X @willoremus

By Trisha Thadani
Trisha Thadani joined The Washington Post in 2023 from the San Francisco Chronicle. She covers the technology industry.follow on X @TrishaThadani

[louis-t]

1. maga is convinced someone is going to force them to drive elctric cars.

I hear from the magas around me that electric cars are "so heavy that shards of rubber are thrown from the vehicles as they corner...." Then in the next breath they complain about high gas prices. By the way, 20 years ago the price was higher than it is now. If inflation was the only factor in gas prices, we would be paying at least $5 a gallon in Michigan. I paid $3.09 yesterday. I remember driving down a long, straight Michigan highway in 2000 and noticed the price at every station along the last 10 miles was $3.59. When I commented to someone at my destination about it, he remarked sarcastically "No collusion there." Oil is a commodity, just like gold. I laugh when I hear commercials saying "Gold is your hedge against inflation!" No, it's not. Remember the idiots like Glenn Beck selling gold at $1,900 an ounce saying"It's going to go through the roof!" then it went down to $1,100.

[FakeNoose]

2. Gas-powered cars are going to be around longer than I am ... and I'm 73

Any American who wants to drive a gas-powered car can do so forever. It's everyone's own choice what they want to drive. But in the future it will become increasingly cheaper and more convenient to drive electric cars. Do you know anyone who drives a horse and buggy? Well I don't, but there are Amish folks who still use them as their main transportation.

Sooner or later everyone will WANT to drive electric, just because it makes sense and it's environmentally efficient.

[LymphocyteLover]

3. So freaking dumb. Of course they wouldn't have to lie and mislead this if they actually had good policies to promote.

[LymphocyteLover]

4. Also, frankly ads like will appeal to some of our base. Because Kamala hasn't really promoted the climate initiatives

that we know she supports, likely because of fracking being popular in Pennsylvania.