Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
ICANN working group seeks to kill WHOIS
http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/465895/icann_working_group_seeks_kill_whois/An Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) working group is seeking public input on a successor to the current WHOIS system used to retrieve domain name information.
The Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services (EWG) has issued a report (PDF) that recommends a radical change from WHOIS. The working group, which had a clean-slate approach to a new domain name information, was formed "to help resolve the nearly decade-long deadlock within the ICANN community on how to replace the current WHOIS system, which is widely regarded as 'broken.'"
With the current system, client software can retrieve database records from a WHOIS server run by a registrar or registry that typically list details such as administrative and technical contact details for the owner of a domain name, name servers and details of the registration and expiry dates of a domain.
The EWG is proposing a shift to an "aggregated RDS (registration data service) (ARDS) model", whereby most access to domain name registration details would be provided from a central repository. This would mean that operators of WHOIS services would no longer have to provide port 43 access to the public (port 43 is generally used for WHOIS queries).
The Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services (EWG) has issued a report (PDF) that recommends a radical change from WHOIS. The working group, which had a clean-slate approach to a new domain name information, was formed "to help resolve the nearly decade-long deadlock within the ICANN community on how to replace the current WHOIS system, which is widely regarded as 'broken.'"
With the current system, client software can retrieve database records from a WHOIS server run by a registrar or registry that typically list details such as administrative and technical contact details for the owner of a domain name, name servers and details of the registration and expiry dates of a domain.
The EWG is proposing a shift to an "aggregated RDS (registration data service) (ARDS) model", whereby most access to domain name registration details would be provided from a central repository. This would mean that operators of WHOIS services would no longer have to provide port 43 access to the public (port 43 is generally used for WHOIS queries).
They can have whois when they pry it out of my cold, dead hands.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2790 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ICANN working group seeks to kill WHOIS (Original Post)
Recursion
Jun 2013
OP
Yes, it can absolutely become more useless than what is currently offered from a WHOIS query
ChromeFoundry
Jun 2013
#3
Look deeper guys...they want to gut whois and go to ards for subscription and query charges
Drew Richards
Mar 2014
#4
ChromeFoundry
(3,270 posts)1. Good riddance to that obsoleted broken P.O.S. RFC
Hopefully the new RFC will force better/more-accurate information from RIPE and other spam sources.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)2. Good point
This can go one of two ways.
ChromeFoundry
(3,270 posts)3. Yes, it can absolutely become more useless than what is currently offered from a WHOIS query
...and then there will be a 25-year to mandatory compliance with the new RFC... There is a good chance that we will never see this fully implemented... much like IPv6.
Drew Richards
(1,558 posts)4. Look deeper guys...they want to gut whois and go to ards for subscription and query charges
Fuck them.