Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum"Pretending That We Are Doing A Good Job, Pretending That It's Not Going To Be That Bad"
As Earths annual average temperature pushes against the 1.5 degree Celsius limit beyond which climatologists expect the impacts of global warming to intensify, social scientists warn that humanity may be about to sleepwalk into a dangerous new era in human history. Research shows the increasing climate shocks could trigger more social unrest and authoritarian, nationalist backlashes. Established by the 2015 Paris Agreement and affirmed by a 2018 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the 1.5 degree mark has been a cliff edge that climate action has endeavored to avoid, but the latest analyses of global temperature data showed 2023 teetering on that red line.
EDIT
But its barely registering with people who are being bombarded with inaccurate climate propaganda and distracted by the rising cost of living and regional wars, said Reinhard Steurer, a climate researcher at the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna. The real danger is that there are so many other crises around us that there is no effort left for the climate crisis, he said. We will find all kinds of reasons not to put more effort into climate protection, because we are overburdened with other things like inflation and wars all around us.
Steurer said he doesnt expect any official announcement from major climate institutions until long after the 1.5 degree threshold is actually crossed, when some years will probably already be edging toward 2 degrees Celsius. I think most scientists recognize that 1.5 is gone, he said. Well be doing this for a very long time, he added, not accepting facts, pretending that we are doing a good job, pretending that its not going to be that bad. In retrospect, using the 1.5 degree temperature rise as the key metric of whether climate action was working may have been a bad idea, he said.
EDIT
Watching the global temperature surging past the 1.5 degree mark without much reaction from the public reinforces the idea that the focus on the physical science of climate change in recent decades came at the expense of studying how people and communities will be affected and react to global warming, said sociologist and author Dana Fisher, a professor in the School of International Service at American University and director of its Center for Environment, Community, and Equity. Its a fools errand to continue down that road right now, she said. Its been an abysmal ratio of funds that are going to understand the social conflict thats going to come from climate shocks, the climate migration and the ways that social processes will have to shift. None of that has been done.
EDIT
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/28012024/with-world-warming-scientists-warn-of-unrest-and-authoritarian-backlash/
NoRethugFriends
(3,038 posts)And by we, I mean my middle age kids and my teen grandkids.
Me (at 74) probably not quite so much.
Random Boomer
(4,261 posts)So be it.