Best Mass Transit Systems
I've never been to Asia (or S. America) and experienced legendary systems such as the Tokyo Subway, so this is based purely on my experiences in N. America and Europe. Please add yours.1. Paris - because the Metro covers the city like a snug coat & the RER gets you to anywhere else in Ile de France.
2. Berlin - great U-Bahn/S-Bahn coverage of a sprawling city.
3. Madrid - a FANTASTIC metro.
4. London - The Tube is sometimes balky and the commuter trains don't always run on shed-yoo-uhl, but it's a massive system and the double deckers rock.
5. New York - because the subway system is so massive.
6. Toronto - for the seamless connections between subway, bus, streetcar and LRT
7. Barcelona - Another excellent metro, with extensive bus and regional train service.
8. Amsterdam - Trams, a metro and an incredible regional rail network.
9. Washington DC - One of the nicest metros to ride, but weird metro-to-bus transfer rules.
10. Brussels - Another European city with a great transit system. Film at 11.
CottonBear
(21,615 posts)The airport is just beautiful and of course is linked by train to the city. I have a good friend who lives there. Three different bus lines run near her parents' home. All of the bus lines link to the local train station. The system is incredibly clean and safe. I was able to go all over the city with ease. The trains and buses always run on time. The city is so beautiful. There are excellent roadways and highways too. It is all very safe and efficient and well designed.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)the two systems, S-Bahn and U-Bahn blanket the city and suburbs, are modern, have short headways and are well linked to rail and air travel.
patrice
(47,992 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)Berlin-I'd make this #1. The U-Bahn and S-Bahn cover the city and surroundings pretty well, but there is also a really extensive light rail system with frequent service getting you everywhere in between.
Prague's system and area is smaller but they cover it well with subway, streetcar and buses that seem to get you everywhere quickly. The system's monthly pass is a bargain. The system is also well linked to the rail network.
Toronto-I thought the comprehensive subway system combined with light rail lines on most thoroughfares above ground (that have frequent service) meant that you could get to most places within the central and inner ring very quickly.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)Never been there myself, though. I wish there was some sort of quality index for mass transit systems, based on universally agreed criteria (percentage of homes within 500m of a transit stop, frequency of service and so on).
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)txlibdem
(6,183 posts)This site has many pictures taken in panoramic view of the Moscow Subway:
... http://www.beeflowers.com/moscowmetro/index.htm
Here's a youtube video.
Some of the architecture is not to my taste but they did some grand work on a massive scale.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Metro
Ready4Change
(6,736 posts)If I lived in Toronto and my home/workplace were in any way accessed by their mass transit I'd use it in a heartbeat. Clean, efficient, and the buses pull right into the train station, which allows you to pay once, even if you make several connections. And it's relatively affordable.
DCs metro system is costlier, you have to pay when changing from subway to/from bus, and it can take 2 hours to get from one side of the system to the other. When I used it (I used to commute from the 'burbs to downtown) I did a cost comparison, and even figuring in wear and tear on the vehicle, driving a car was cheaper, often faster, and left me with more flexibility. The single advantage riding metro had was that the time it took was more consistent. I hear they are about to raise their rates yet again. Glad I don't depend on that.