Women Underrepresented in World of Art

[niyad]

Women Underrepresented in World of Art

I found this short piece by Emma Shapiro in The Art Newsletter that explores the presence of women artists at MoMA (which has a great new exhibit by Barbara Kruger). It was a timely reminder that women face similar barriers across all disciplines and sectors, and to paraphrase Frederick Douglass, that imbalance won’t change “without a demand.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cf_nr7VFfVA/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=339c554f-2784-47e5-8a36-e7bb777a53f8

Idly scrolling through Instagram, I pause when I see Sex and the City’s Charlotte circa-2002 beaming out at me. “Welcome to the Museum of Modern Art,” she declares in the caption, “Did you know that here at MoMA, less than 10% of the work is by women artists? And even fewer are by women of colour?” As I try to remember her chipper voice delivering this startling fact, I scroll to the accompanying text from Art Girl Rising, an activist organisation that fights for women’s representation in the art world. About Charlotte’s 2002 factoid, the text tells me: “That was 20 years ago. TWENTY. The numbers haven’t budged much since then!” I find myself staring, lost in worried thought. Have things really not changed in 20 years? Or, rather, am I actually surprised?

Sadly, Charlotte never did boldly announce gender disparity in the middle of MoMA, in real life or on TV. Art Girl Rising simply used the familiar pop culture reference to capture the attention of Instagram users like myself and point us towards a very real, ongoing issue.

Upsettingly, the idea that, in 2002, 10% of MoMA’s collection was by women seems generous when in 2004’s re-hang of the permanent collection (with works spanning from 1879-1969), that number was closer to 5%. Jerry Saltz’s 2007 article Where Are All The Women? for New York magazine noted that the re-hang exhibited only 20 works by women out of 415 in 2004, and 19 out of 399 in 2006. Twelve years later, MoMA’s formerly abysmal representation of women rose to 23%— or 336 of 1,443 exhibited works. Apparent progress but still a deep divide, one that the art historian Maura Reilly described as “tokenism”. For ARTnews, Reilly framed the massive 2019 re-hang as both exciting but disappointing — the central characters continued to be the white men of always, with women and artists of colour in supporting roles.


https://msmagazine.com/2022/07/29/states-gender-parity-women-politics-representation-quota/

[applegrove]

1. Those big spider sculptures by Louise Bourgeois you see

outside some museums around the world are the most expensive works of art that have ever been sold by a female. In Ottawa the National Gallery bought one for $3.2 million for one of the bronzes. Don't know how much the stainless steel one went for.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maman_(sculpture)

[niyad]

2. Thank you for sharing this fascinating information.

[applegrove]

3. I thought it was something that hers was the most expensive female created

art when you consider what a male impressionists work sells for. My jaw dropped.