Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
American History
Related: About this forumAs World War One centennial nears, fight erupts over memorial
The Liberty Memorial Tower soars above the National World War One Museum in Kansas City, Missouri, February 24, 2012. REUTERS/Dave Kaup
By Kevin Murphy | Reuters Mon, Mar 5, 2012
KANSAS CITY, Missouri (Reuters) - Back in 1926, nobody balked when President Calvin Coolidge dedicated Kansas City's towering Liberty Memorial as the national memorial to the First World War.
But as the 100th anniversary of the beginning of "the Great War" approaches in 2014, a tussle has broken out between Kansas City and Washington, D.C. over which city should be the site of the nation's "official" World War One memorial.
In 2004, Congress voted to designate the Kansas City memorial as the official museum, but late last year support emerged for having the memorial on the National Mall in the nation's capital.
A bill designating both locations as national memorials has also stalled, delaying fundraising for the U.S. observation of the approaching centennial.
More: http://news.yahoo.com/world-war-one-centennial-nears-fight-erupts-over-193127471.html
I favor Kansas City, I think it's an appropriate place and Washington D.C. doesn't need another memorial service that people will just forget.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 3072 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As World War One centennial nears, fight erupts over memorial (Original Post)
ellisonz
Mar 2012
OP
I'm fine keeping the WW 1 memorial in Kansas City. What we NEED is a Nat'l Civil War memorial.
charlie and algernon
Mar 2012
#1
charlie and algernon
(13,447 posts)1. I'm fine keeping the WW 1 memorial in Kansas City. What we NEED is a Nat'l Civil War memorial.
I don't get how the bloodiest, most costly war in American History still doesn't have a National Memorial.
ellisonz
(27,739 posts)2. I think it's a question...
...of whether we call it "The Civil War" or the "War of Northern Aggression"
zipplewrath
(16,692 posts)3. Lincoln Memorial
Quite honestly, there are a number of places that may already fill that bill. The entire Gettysburg area comes to mind. And really, I'd hesitate to even attempt one in the current political climate. You can imagine flag based controversies would abound. Heck, just what to call it would be a huge political football.
Were you thinking DC for this memorial? Appomattox comes to mind. So does Fort Sumter. Bull Run, Manassas, Gettysburg all come to mind as well.