Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumAlabama Republicans push bill to allow denial of marriages on basis of beliefs
Source: The Guardian
Alabama Republicans push bill to allow denial of marriages on basis of beliefs
Jessica Glenza
Thursday 5 March 2015 17.31 GMT
A Republican-led bill in Alabamas state legislature could radically alter the institution of marriage for Alabamians.
The bill was written in reaction to a federal judge striking down the states same-sex marriage ban, and sponsors say it could clear up confusion and protect religious rights. But activists say the bills implications would reach far beyond the LGBT community, and claim it is little more than an attempt to remove rights under the guise of religious freedom.
The bill allows ministers and judges to opt out of performing or critically recognizing any marriage that defies their convictions. The bill, the Freedom of Religion in Marriage Protection Act, also allows religiously affiliated social organizations to deny service on the basis of religion, activists said.
Legal experts say religiously affiliated hospitals could refuse visits from a sick patients spouse, on the basis that their marriage defies their religious convictions.
Judges could refuse to grant a divorce if divorce was against their religious beliefs; a Catholic judge could refuse to marry a Hindu, Muslim or Jewish couple, Susan Watson, said executive director with Alabamas American Civil Liberties Union.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Jessica Glenza
Thursday 5 March 2015 17.31 GMT
A Republican-led bill in Alabamas state legislature could radically alter the institution of marriage for Alabamians.
The bill was written in reaction to a federal judge striking down the states same-sex marriage ban, and sponsors say it could clear up confusion and protect religious rights. But activists say the bills implications would reach far beyond the LGBT community, and claim it is little more than an attempt to remove rights under the guise of religious freedom.
The bill allows ministers and judges to opt out of performing or critically recognizing any marriage that defies their convictions. The bill, the Freedom of Religion in Marriage Protection Act, also allows religiously affiliated social organizations to deny service on the basis of religion, activists said.
Legal experts say religiously affiliated hospitals could refuse visits from a sick patients spouse, on the basis that their marriage defies their religious convictions.
Judges could refuse to grant a divorce if divorce was against their religious beliefs; a Catholic judge could refuse to marry a Hindu, Muslim or Jewish couple, Susan Watson, said executive director with Alabamas American Civil Liberties Union.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/05/alabama-republicans-bill-deny-marriages-services-religious-beliefs
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1681 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alabama Republicans push bill to allow denial of marriages on basis of beliefs (Original Post)
Eugene
Mar 2015
OP
If your beliefs get in the way of doing your job, you need to choose one or the other.
eppur_se_muova
Mar 2015
#2
CanonRay
(14,864 posts)1. Why don't they just secede and get it over with
They are basically taking white-out to the constitution.
eppur_se_muova
(37,407 posts)2. If your beliefs get in the way of doing your job, you need to choose one or the other.
I'd prefer these bozos part with their jobs.
stone space
(6,498 posts)3. Why would somebody who doesn't believe in marriage...
...take a job that involves marryin' folks in the first place?