Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumProsecutor And Cop Lose It Over Idea Of Over Idea Of Needing A Conviction To Take Property
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/oklahoma-civil-asset-forfeiture_56461dd1e4b045bf3deedb11?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592Law enforcement officials in Oklahoma are distraught about a bill to reform civil asset forfeiture.
Nick Wing
Senior Viral Editor, The Huffington Post
Posted: 11/13/2015 06:21 PM EST | Edited: 11/13/2015 06:24 PM EST
Oklahoma might be best known as a home to Sooners, Cowboys and country music fans, but a local prosecutor and police officer say the state will be welcoming violent drug cartels if a Republican lawmaker gets his way.
State Sen. Kyle Loveless has been trying to muster support this year for a bill that would reform a controversial law enforcement tool known as civil asset forfeiture. Using the practice, police and prosecutors in the state work together to permanently seize cash and property -- including cars, homes and businesses -- based on the suspicion that it's connected to criminal activity.
Proponents maintain that civil asset forfeiture is an important crime-fighting tool, often saying it lets them attack the profits of drug traffickers even when there's not a clear criminal link. But it gives authorities the power to take property without charging its owner with a crime, much less securing a conviction. In Oklahoma, the state isn't even required to provide definitive proof of the alleged criminal ties before taking control of the property, selling it and giving the money back to the departments involved in the case.
Loveless sees this as a fundamental violation of people's rights to due process and property and says the lax standards have gotten innocent people in Oklahoma caught in the civil asset forfeiture net. On Thursday, he sparred with Tulsa County District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler and Eric Dalgleish, a major at the Tulsa Police Department, over the merits of his bill to require a criminal conviction to permanently take someone's property.
Podcast available here:
PC and Eddie with State Senator Kyle Lovelace, DA Steve Kunzweiler, and TPD officer Major Dalgleish on civil asset forfeiture reform
http://www.1170kfaq.com/podcasts/patcampbell/347010772.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 2115 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prosecutor And Cop Lose It Over Idea Of Over Idea Of Needing A Conviction To Take Property (Original Post)
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2015
OP
I'm $ure there are rea$on$ these law$ are popular in law enforcement circle$
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2015
#2
annabanana
(52,791 posts)1. of COURSE it's a violation of due process and property rights....
It astounds me that these laws ever get on the books without STRICT caveats
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)2. I'm $ure there are rea$on$ these law$ are popular in law enforcement circle$
Thou$and$ and thou$and$ of them...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,578 posts)4. +1 ^^^
that's 3 thumbs up
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)3. Alas that it's left to a Republican to point out the obvious.
Where are the Democrats on this issue of fundamental rights?
-app