Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,961 posts)
Wed Jul 26, 2017, 09:14 AM Jul 2017

Op-ed in TWSJ.: Law-enforcement agencies seize billions a year without filing charges

Go in through the Twitter account for free access.

Opinion: Law-enforcement agencies seize billions a year without filing charges, writes @TonyLimaAssoc




https://twitter.com/TonyLimaAssoc

Cops and Robbers, All Rolled Into One
Law-enforcement agencies seize billions a year without filing charges. Even burglars take less.

By Tony Lima
July 24, 2017 7:04 p.m. ET

There aren’t many things government can claim to do more efficiently than the private sector. Taking people’s property is one. In 2014 the federal government seized about $4.5 billion from people who hadn’t been charged with crimes. That exceeds the private-sector equivalent, burglary. According to an analysis by Armstrong Economics, perpetrators absconded with only $3.9 billion that year.

Since 2007 the Drug Enforcement Administration alone has seized more than $3 billion in currency from individuals in civil actions under which legal protections for criminal charges do not apply. Criminal asset forfeiture requires an indictment against both an individual and the property in question. With civil asset forfeiture only the property is charged before being seized.

Last week Attorney General Jeff Sessions stated his intention to increase the volume of these asset forfeitures. Contrary to published reports, the Sessions directive does not extend asset forfeiture to states that have outlawed the practice. It clarifies that federal asset forfeiture can only be applied to violations of federal law.

But there’s no doubt Mr. Sessions is putting himself in bad company. As California attorney general, Kamala Harris opposed a 2011 law restraining the practice of civil asset forfeiture. In 2015 she sponsored a bill to allow authorities to seize suspects’ assets before filing charges. That year California forfeitures totaled $50 million. Ms. Harris is now a U.S. senator in the midst of a 2020 presidential boomlet.
....

Mr. Lima is a professor emeritus of economics at California State University, East Bay.

Appeared in the July 25, 2017, print edition.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Op-ed in TWSJ.: Law-enfor...