Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumJudge orders L.A. Times to alter story about Glendale cop, sparking protest from newspaper
"Congress shall make no law, yak, yak, yak.
VeryStableHat Retweeted:
VERY SERIOUS, HIGHLY UNUSUAL: Federal judge orders L.A. Times to alter story about Glendale cop. The newspaper declares order unconstitutional, vows fight
Link to tweet
Judge orders L.A. Times to alter story about Glendale cop, sparking protest from newspaper
By CINDY CHANG JUL 14, 2018 | 8:40 PM
A federal judge on Saturday ordered the Los Angeles Times to remove information from an article that described a plea agreement between prosecutors and a Glendale police detective accused of working with the Mexican Mafia, a move the newspaper decried as highly unusual and unconstitutional.
The agreement was supposed to have been filed under seal, but it was mistakenly made available on PACER, a public online database for federal court documents.
In response to the order from U.S. District Judge John F. Walter, The Times revised the article to eliminate information about the sealed document. The newspaper intends to contest the order.
We believe that once material is in the public record, it is proper and appropriate to publish it if it is newsworthy, said Norman Pearlstine, executive editor of the Los Angeles Times. ... Kelli Sager, an attorney representing The Times, said the 1st Amendment includes a strong presumption against government actions that prevent someone from speaking or publishing information.
....
By CINDY CHANG JUL 14, 2018 | 8:40 PM
A federal judge on Saturday ordered the Los Angeles Times to remove information from an article that described a plea agreement between prosecutors and a Glendale police detective accused of working with the Mexican Mafia, a move the newspaper decried as highly unusual and unconstitutional.
The agreement was supposed to have been filed under seal, but it was mistakenly made available on PACER, a public online database for federal court documents.
In response to the order from U.S. District Judge John F. Walter, The Times revised the article to eliminate information about the sealed document. The newspaper intends to contest the order.
We believe that once material is in the public record, it is proper and appropriate to publish it if it is newsworthy, said Norman Pearlstine, executive editor of the Los Angeles Times. ... Kelli Sager, an attorney representing The Times, said the 1st Amendment includes a strong presumption against government actions that prevent someone from speaking or publishing information.
....
Seems like a pretty dumb order in light of this: https://web.archive.org/web/20180714180330/http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-glendale-detective-guilty-plea-20180714-story.html
Link to tweet
https://web.archive.org/web/20180714180330/http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-glendale-detective-guilty-plea-20180714-story.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 2249 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge orders L.A. Times to alter story about Glendale cop, sparking protest from newspaper (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2018
OP
Federal Judge Issues Illegitimate Prior Restraint Order Against Los Angeles Times In Federal Crimina
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2018
#4
Fed. Court Vacates Prior Restraint Order Against LA Times, But Blasts Press In Attempt To Justify It
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2018
#6
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)1. The First Amendment speaks for itself.
I hope the newspaper appeals.
We either have a free press or we don't have a free press.
And if we don't have a free press, we have no freedom at all.
Historic NY
(37,859 posts)2. Now its in the twittersphere too....
the big question is he going to jail.
packman
(16,296 posts)3. Judge is blowing it out of his ass
Stupid order and seriously dangerous if allowed.
mahatmakanejeeves
(60,960 posts)4. Federal Judge Issues Illegitimate Prior Restraint Order Against Los Angeles Times In Federal Crimina
Federal Judge Issues Illegitimate Prior Restraint Order Against Los Angeles Times In Federal Criminal Case
Link to tweet
Federal Judge Issues Illegitimate Prior Restraint Order Against Los Angeles Times In Federal Criminal Case
JULY 16, 2018 BY KEN WHITE 10 COMMENTS
JULY 16, 2018 BY KEN WHITE 10 COMMENTS
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)5. This is the bit that was removed- spread it around:
John Saro Balian, 45, pleaded guilty to one count each of soliciting a bribe, obstruction of justice and making false statements to federal investigators as part of a plea agreement he reached with prosecutors. The document was ordered to be filed under seal but appeared on PACER, a public online database for court documents.
According to the agreement, filed in U.S. District Court, Balian agreed to cooperate with federal authorities by responding truthfully and completely in interviews and court proceedings. He is scheduled to be sentenced in September, when prosecutors are expected to recommend a reduced sentence.
The charges to which he pleaded guilty carry a maximum sentence of 35 years in prison.
According to the agreement, filed in U.S. District Court, Balian agreed to cooperate with federal authorities by responding truthfully and completely in interviews and court proceedings. He is scheduled to be sentenced in September, when prosecutors are expected to recommend a reduced sentence.
The charges to which he pleaded guilty carry a maximum sentence of 35 years in prison.
mahatmakanejeeves
(60,960 posts)6. Fed. Court Vacates Prior Restraint Order Against LA Times, But Blasts Press In Attempt To Justify It
Federal Court Vacates Prior Restraint Order Against LA Times, But Blasts Press In Attempt To Justify It
Link to tweet
Federal Court Vacates Prior Restraint Order Against LA Times, But Blasts Press In Attempt To Justify It
JULY 17, 2018 BY KEN WHITE
....
It's good that Judge Walter vacated his order. But it's unacceptable that he issued it in the first place, and unbecoming and regrettable that he blasted the press for printing important information about a federal case. A dirty cop cooperating against gangs is news. They were right to publish. He was wrong to issue the order, and wrong to try to justify it.
JULY 17, 2018 BY KEN WHITE
....
It's good that Judge Walter vacated his order. But it's unacceptable that he issued it in the first place, and unbecoming and regrettable that he blasted the press for printing important information about a federal case. A dirty cop cooperating against gangs is news. They were right to publish. He was wrong to issue the order, and wrong to try to justify it.