Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumAs Alabama AG, Jeff Sessions tried to ban public university students from discussing LGBTQ issues
WouldOrWouldn'tHat Retweeted:As Alabama AG, Jeff Sessions tried to ban public university students from discussing LGBTQ issues on campus. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/10/jeff_sessions_tried_to_stop_lgbtq_students_from_meeting_at_a_public_university.html
Link to tweet
THE LAW, LAWYERS, AND THE COURT.OCT. 3 2017 11:38 AM
Sessions the Censor
The attorney general says he values free speech. In 1996, he tried to stop LGBTQ students from meeting at a public university.
By Mark Joseph Stern
Last week, Attorney General Jeff Sessions delivered a speech at Georgetown University Law Center in which he argued that freedom of thought and speech on the American campus are under attack. As my colleague Dahlia Lithwick explained, the attorney general said this in a room full of prescreened students who asked him prescreened questions while political demonstrators outside were penned off in free speech zones. Ensconced in a safe space of his own, Sessions blasted the notion that speech can be hurtful, criticizing administrators and students for their crackdown on speech they may have disagreed with.
Sessions hypocrisy on speech issues is not a new development. In 1996, the thenattorney general of Alabama used the full power of his office to try to shut down an LGBTQ conference at the University of Alabama. Sessions took his battle to court, asking a federal judge to let him block the conference altogetheror, at the very least, silence students who wished to discuss LGBTQ issues. He ultimately failed, but his campaign reveals a great deal about his highly selective view of free expression. Sessions claims to support freedom for offensive speech, but when speech offends him, he is all too happy to play the censor.
When Sessions served as Alabama attorney general, the state still criminalized sodomy. A 1992 law, Alabama Education Code Section 16-1-28, also barred public universities from funding, recognizing, or supporting any group that fosters or promotes a lifestyle or actions prohibited by the sodomy statute, either directly or indirectly. The law also forbade schools from allowing such organizations to use public facilities. Sessions predecessor, Jimmy Evans, had interpreted the statute to effectively outlaw the discussion or promotion of gay rights on public campuses, with that prohibition even extending to AIDS awareness campaigns.
In 1995, the University of South Alabamas Gay Lesbian Bisexual Alliance sued in federal court to block Section 16-1-28. That summer, the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled that, under the First Amendment, public universities may not deny access to facilities or funding for student organizations on the basis of their viewpoints. This decision, the GLBA asserted, rendered Section 16-1-28 unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Myron H. Thompson agreed, holding the law to be invalid in a January 1996 ruling. ... This decision was excellent news for the Gay Lesbian Bisexual Alliance at the University of Alabama at Tuscaloosa. The GLBA had planned to host the Fifth Annual Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual College Conference of the Southeastern United States in February 1996. Sessions, by now attorney general, was trying his hardest to shut it down.
....
AldoLeopold
(617 posts)"You are talking about vengeance. Will vengeance bring your son back to you? Or my boy to me? I forgo the vengeance of my son. But I have selfish reasons! My youngest son was forced to leave this country... because of this Clinton business! Now I have to make arrangements to bring him home safely. But, if some unfortunate accident might befall him. Or if he gets shot in the head by a police officer... Or if he gets struck by a bolt of lightning, I'm going to blame some of the people in this room! And that I do not forgive. But, that aside, I assure that I will not be the one to break the peace we have made here today."
Years ago I was a liberal. Not that long ago - I voted for Obama twice. This is not a troll post. Please understand that. I actually know where you're coming from. I do not think it will be good for us if you persist.
Since I was young, I have had an awakening. These reasons I will not mention, nor will you pay attention to. I just needed a bit of solace in a post to zealots. I do think you are zealots - and I have not used this word very often - I think you have become just like the National Socialist Party. A people of waning values and morals which are not held by most of the population...so you resort to bitter tactics. Is this right?
What are you doing? This wasn't even liberalism when I was a liberal. You are hurting this country. Very badly. You will see it as a victory, but it is not. I love my country. I love the world more, and now, maybe only in the meantime, the United States is the world. It won't be forever, so we should leave something lasting and good before we are done. Yes?
Please stop. You've created maniacs all over the country. This I think is true. This is not good. Please stop. Stop with the press manipulation, stop with the violence, stop with the anarchy.
My youngest - my son, he is 22, is a reasonable man. I want his future in this country to be good and prosperous. I think many may hinder that.
In my old age, I'd say that violence will only cause more problems than any here realize. This is not good.
This I will say: If you feel like you must persist in these actions and in these repercussions to duly held elections, things will get to a very bad place. I don't think either of us want that. No matter what your political bent.
Step back - please. None of this can come to any kind of good. We're all pawns of someone bigger than us - but we do not have to act like Mongols chopping off heads before they enter a new village.
I'm asking you kindly - please stop with this.
mahatmakanejeeves
(60,960 posts)alerting on the post.
I get it. Thanks for writing.