Pregnant bystander mauled by police dog denied by judge in federal lawsuit

[mahatmakanejeeves]

ShoutyJobSeekingHat Retweeted:

Today in federal jurisprudence: If a police dog mauls you, but you weren't the intended target when the officer let it loose, it was just a gorsh durn mistake and your constitutional rights weren't violated

Link to tweet

Pregnant bystander mauled by police dog denied by judge in federal lawsuit

by Associated Press Wednesday, October 3rd 2018

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — A "horrendous" police dog attack that severely wounded a pregnant Indianapolis woman did not violate her constitutional rights because she wasn't the dog's intended target, a federal judge has ruled. ... U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Walton Pratt found last week that while Mara Mancini suffered "horrendous injuries" in the July 2015 attack, she was an "unintended bystander" and no force was intentionally directed at her, so there was no violation of her Fourth Amendment rights, The Indianapolis Star reported .

Mancini was seven months pregnant when she heard a commotion outside and stepped onto her front porch to investigate. A police dog pursuing a male suspect in her neighborhood attacked Mancini, tearing chunks of flesh from her arm and thigh, she told the newspaper.

Mancini, who suffered premature contractions that doctors were able to stop, sued the city of Indianapolis and the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department in 2016. She alleged that the attack violated her constitutional right to be secure against search and seizure, and challenged Indiana law and legal precedent that grants immunity to police dogs under Indiana's dog bite liability statute. ... But Pratt ruled Sept. 28 that the officers' release of the dog "intending to seize the fleeing suspect does not mean that the officers intended to seize any other person."
....

{Jon Little, Mancini's attorney,} said surgeons have told his client that the nerve damage to her arm, which has severely impaired its function, is irreparable. He said Mancini will likely have to declare bankruptcy to pay her medical bills without the police department or the city being held responsible for the incident or her damages. ... Mancini underwent multiple surgeries for her injuries and took painkillers that caused her son to be born with a narcotics addiction that he had to be weaned off over several weeks in neonatal intensive care, according to her suit. ... "The city should be ashamed of themselves," Little said.

___

Information from: The Indianapolis Star, http://www.indystar.com

Full order here for law dorks: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.insd.67411/gov.uscourts.insd.67411.80.0.pdf …

Link to tweet

[WhiteTara]

1. It's called torte immunity.

[magicarpet]

2. Wow,... Poor woman. Her monetary damages ignored,...WTF.

Isn't Fascism fun ?
Get used to it.

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

3. Lesson learned:

Those that ignored the screams of Kitty Genovese did the right thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kitty_Genovese

In all cases, those employing a means of investigation, control or attack should remain responsible for collateral damage regardless of whether the damage is caused by a police firearm, a police vehicle, a satchel charge dropped from a helicopter or drone strike in a foreign country.

In all cases, humanity should supersede legal immunity.

[ROB-ROX]

4. THIS IS CRIMINAL

There is NO justice in that state. I am glad I do not live in this "third world country" state. The justice is VERY corrupt which supports the attack of a defenseless person by armed and badged IDIOTS.......