Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(117,207 posts)
Sun Nov 30, 2014, 05:57 AM Nov 2014

Researchers developing breath test for pot

Researchers at Washington State University are working on a breath test to determine if a driver is under the influence of marijuana.

The News Tribune reports (http://bit.ly/15KK247 ) that law enforcement officers have a test for alcohol, but they don't have a tool to test for marijuana impairment. Right now, officers must use blood tests to determine if THC is present in a driver's blood.

But WSU chemistry professor Herbert Hill says existing technologies like those used by airport security agents to detect drugs and explosives can be altered to test breath for THC. Hill says his team hopes to start testing on humans early next year.

The Washington State Patrol says it welcomes anything that gets impaired drivers off the road.

http://www.statesman.com/ap/ap/us/researchers-developing-breath-test-for-pot/njHrM/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Researchers developing breath test for pot (Original Post) TexasTowelie Nov 2014 OP
Had to happen, I suppose Android3.14 Nov 2014 #1
I hear it just looks for the smell of Doritos® tomm2thumbs Nov 2014 #2
+1 Auggie Nov 2014 #5
whats wrong with field sobriety tests? Garion_55 Nov 2014 #3
I could smoke all night and still walk a straight line Hari Seldon Nov 2014 #7
Be a safe user Jim23434 Nov 2014 #4
Prove I'm impaired sorefeet Nov 2014 #6
Impairment should be the only test that matters. Scuba Nov 2014 #8
Agreed tech3149 Nov 2014 #9
Only way the test could be valid is if it measured AMOUNT of pot in your system. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2014 #10

Garion_55

(1,925 posts)
3. whats wrong with field sobriety tests?
Sun Nov 30, 2014, 07:39 AM
Nov 2014

doesnt matter what drug you are on if you cant walk a straight line.

 

Hari Seldon

(154 posts)
7. I could smoke all night and still walk a straight line
Sun Nov 30, 2014, 08:14 AM
Nov 2014

I drove across the country stoned.

Impairment. Sigh...

Well, if thats the standard we should stop talking about pot.

 

Jim23434

(5 posts)
4. Be a safe user
Sun Nov 30, 2014, 07:49 AM
Nov 2014

As someone that has been using marijuana from the sixties to present time I am glad such a test is being developed. Under present law a blood test convicts me for something I did weeks ago.

Treat the drug with respect, it does slow your reflexes, and I for one would find it hard to sleep at nights wondering if that accident causing harm to others was my fault because of being just a little high.

sorefeet

(1,241 posts)
6. Prove I'm impaired
Sun Nov 30, 2014, 08:09 AM
Nov 2014

it would be easy to build a machine that detects pot, but PROVE that I am impaired. I have been using for well over 45 years and I just don't get impaired. 2 beers today now that I don't hardly drink ,scares me to death. I am impaired. 20 years ago 2 beers only pissed me of, like, where is the rest of the 12 pack?? Prove I am impaired. No more FOR PROFIT, life ruining hassles from the pigs.

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
9. Agreed
Sun Nov 30, 2014, 09:50 AM
Nov 2014

If I remember correctly, THC can be detected in the blood long after any perceptible effect has dissipated. That would require the blood concentration level to be established by standards that don't exist as far as i know.
As someone who has been what is now considered a heavy drinker for years I know my capacity to operate without perceptible impairment at BAC levels that are considered intoxicated is common.
I don't think a breath test would be an indicative test considering factors like edibles, the aforementioned verified and accepted standards, and whether it is measuring only psychoactive cannabinoids.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,011 posts)
10. Only way the test could be valid is if it measured AMOUNT of pot in your system.
Sun Nov 30, 2014, 11:17 AM
Nov 2014

"presence" of pot ( actually its metabolites) can be seen for 30 days or more, it is stored in fat cells.
They would need a verifiable way to test for amount=impaired.
As far as I know, there is no agreed upon measurement for impaired.

I doubt any test would be valid in the current # of legal pot states.

btw....most DUI detectors are supposed to be "calibrated" every so often, and DUIs are often tossed out if you can afford a lawyer who can challenge calibration of the device.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Drug Policy»Researchers developing br...