Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Media
Related: About this forumFCC votes to “unlock the cable box” over Republican opposition
The Federal Communications Commission today approved a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that seeks to give consumers more choices in the set-top boxes they use to watch cable TV.
The vote was 3-2, with Chairman Tom Wheeler and fellow Democrats Mignon Clyburn and Jessica Rosenworcel voting in favor of the proposal, while Republicans Ajit Pai and Michael O'Rielly voted against. An NPRM is not a final vote. Instead, this will kick off a months-long public comment period leading up to a final vote that is likely to happen before the end of this year.
The FCC is essentially trying to create a software-based replacement for CableCard. Pay-TV operators from the cable, satellite, and telco industries would have to provide content and programming information to makers of third-party hardware or applications. Theoretically, customers could then watch their TV channels on various devices without needing to rent a set-top box from their cable company and without buying equipment that is compatible with a physical CableCard.
One possibility is that new set-top boxes could combine online video sources with cable TV channels.
The proposal has been criticized by cable companies and Republicans. Critics say it would force cable companies to build new hardware and require customers to rent even more boxes. They also say the proposal would let third-party set-top box makers insert their own advertising into pay-TV content and undermine programming agreements between programmers and pay-TV companies.
Wheeler accused proponents of spreading misinformation.
"Nothing in this item requires a second box in the home," he said. "There is nothing in here that allows third parties to disaggregate cable content or sell advertising around it... It takes the same system that goes to the cable box today with the same structures and moves it through a different box requiring the same structures. As a result, existing copyrights and programming agreements are unaffected, consumer privacy is protected, emergency alerts are passed through and child protection laws are unaffected. Nothing in this proposal slows down or stops cable innovation."
Wheeler said the new rule will prohibit makers of set-top boxes and apps from putting extra advertising around pay-TV content.
Pay-TV companies will be required to deliver a few information streams to makers of other set-top boxes and apps. They include channel listings, video-on-demand lineups, information about what a device is allowed to do with content (such as recording), and the actual programming consumers are entitled to receive. Customers would still need a cable TV subscription for this to work.
Pay-TV companies would have two years to comply.
More: arstechnica.com/business
Also: .Wired
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 3158 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FCC votes to “unlock the cable box” over Republican opposition (Original Post)
Stellar
Mar 2016
OP
I'd love to simply be able to buy my hardware and not pay monthly rental fees for boxes.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Mar 2016
#1
another reminder for the "two sides of the same coin" cannard about Dems and Repukes
corkhead
Mar 2016
#4
but but but that cant be cause both sides are the same the cons are against that means the dems
saturnsring
Mar 2016
#5
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)1. I'd love to simply be able to buy my hardware and not pay monthly rental fees for boxes.
Seems like a rip-off.
MADem
(135,425 posts)2. I. Can't. WAIT!!!! nt
lunasun
(21,646 posts)3. thank you Chairman Wheeler
corkhead
(6,119 posts)4. another reminder for the "two sides of the same coin" cannard about Dems and Repukes
Don't get me wrong, they are more similar than I would like, but things like this show they are not completely the same.
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)6. beat me to it by 1 minute
corkhead
(6,119 posts)7. Time to utilize that "great minds think alike" cannard
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)5. but but but that cant be cause both sides are the same the cons are against that means the dems
are against it too......how can this be what with you having a republican president