Mix the Bible and Electric Universe in a bowl, stir...

[DetlefK]

...and you will be able to disprove that our Sun is a star, whereupon our entire cosmological model collapses.

http://www.geocities.com/rebornempowered/thesun.htm
Quote: " To admit this, for the scientific world, is clearly NOT an option, so more time and money will be spent on trying to KEEP GOD OUT of the equation."

If God is part of the equation, shouldn't he arise as a part of physics even if we exclude the Bible as reference?






Btw, the "missing Neutrinos"-problem he cites was actually solved about 10 years ago. (And it's really a third as many as expected, not half as many. That's how crappy his source is.)

[DavidDvorkin]

1. "The goal of this paper is to prove, using only the Bible, that the Sun is NOT a star."

There's no point in reading beyond that statement.

[SwissTony]

2. New Scientific Evidence About Stars...

and he cites a privately published monograph from 1944!!!!! New indeed.

His "difference" between the sun and the stars is actually an argument against the bible.

When the stars fall, where will they fall to?

To be fair to him, this drivel is 10 years old, so he may have missed the neutrinos.