Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 09:17 AM Jul 2015

Saw this all over Facebook

Just wondering what skeptics have to say about it. Is there more to it?

BTW.... I'm perfectly OK with GMOs, y'know.

http://www.thelocal.de/20150626/concerns-over-safety-of-german-breast-milk


The Green Party warned on Friday about the health risks of breast-feeding after traces of a substance found in weed-killer were found in breast milk.
The Green party made their warning after testing the breast milk of 16 women from a variety of German regions.

Traces of glyphosate, a chemical used in weed-killers, amounting to between 0.210 and 0.432 nanograms per mililitre (PPB) were recorded.

For breast milk testing results for Glyphosate from the U.S. in 2014 click here

In drinking water a quantity of no more than 0.100 nanograms of the substance is allowed.

Irene Witte, professor of toxicology at the University of Oldenburg described the findings as “intolerable.”

“I would never have guessed that the quantities are so high,” she said.


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Saw this all over Facebook (Original Post) AlbertCat Jul 2015 OP
No surprise here randr Jul 2015 #1
That's a blanket statement with little or no basis in reality. Archae Jul 2015 #2
Nope. progressoid Jul 2015 #3

randr

(12,480 posts)
1. No surprise here
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 09:49 AM
Jul 2015

GMO's, touted for being an answer to world hunger, are in fact designed to allow more spraying of pesticides which are of course sold by the same people promoting GMO manipulation.

Archae

(46,807 posts)
2. That's a blanket statement with little or no basis in reality.
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 10:17 AM
Jul 2015

"But...but...MONSATAN!!!"

Monsanto is not a bunch of mad scientists cackling gleefully as they chase animals and poke plants with needles.

And besides, Monsanto is not the only company that is involved with GMO's.

Not to mention, some "organic" food producers use pesticides and herbicides that are far more poisonous than Roundup ever is or was.

And organic is big business as well.

progressoid

(50,747 posts)
3. Nope.
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 02:15 PM
Jul 2015
On average, GM technology has increased crop yields by 21% (Figure 2). These yield increases are not due to higher genetic yield potential, but to more effective pest control and thus lower crop damage [27]. At the same time, GM crops have reduced pesticide quantity by 37% and pesticide cost by 39%. The effect on the cost of production is not significant. GM seeds are more expensive than non-GM seeds, but the additional seed costs are compensated through savings in chemical and mechanical pest control. Average profit gains for GM-adopting farmers are 69%.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111629
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»Saw this all over Faceboo...