2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWisconsin recount observer says Waukesha County is double-counting Donald Trump votes
http://www.palmerreport.com/news/waukesha-wisconsin-double-donald-trump/381/As the statewide Wisconsin recount continues to get underway, the recount observers representing various presidential candidates have been sharing their first hand experiences online. Observers in some counties have found no issues at all, while others have reported concerns and suspicious incidents. But one recount observer Waukesha County is now making the flat out accusation that county officials are purposely double counting Donald Trumps votes and pulling other shenanigans during the recount.
The accusation comes from recount observer John West, who has been documenting his experiences on his own publicly visible Facebook page. On Sunday evening he flatly declared that Im calling out fraud. West went on to make the following specific accusations: Waukesha County Wisconsin is obstructing the recount blatantly. Making up rules to shut out allowed observers. Double counting Republican ballots. Taking machines out and returning machines that break down after midnight hoping to avoid any observers.
In the comments section of his own post, linked above, he went on to elaborate that They arent invalidating clear duplicate and unsigned ballots that were mailed in, thus explaining how the double-counting is taking place.
These are serious accusations of improper behavior, which if proven true would represent criminal fraud. Were reaching out to Mr. West to determine what evidence he has in terms of documenting the behavior in question. But the mere fact that a Wisconsin observer is making these accusations is newsworthy in and of itself, as he claims to have witnessed all of the above with his own eyes. This is particularly notable in that Waukesha is one of just twelve Wisconsin counties (out of seventy-two) which have are refusing to a hand recount, instead relying on a machine recount.
ucrdem
(15,714 posts)thanks!
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)See Great America PAC v. WISCONSIN ELECTION COMMISSION, filed December 1, 2016 federal court, seeking stay of recount for application of non uniform standards, et al.
For case and analysis see http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028330798
Maraya1969
(23,001 posts)And someone said that there would be "watchers" But there were fucking "watchers" during the election!
God they need to be really strict with this whole thing.
What did that watcher do besides report it? They can't say anything right at the time?
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,882 posts)the many documented suspicious activities (machines being serviced in early ams before recount began, co. workers given instruction in how to make the recount nos. match the computer totals, etc.) were as troubling as the probable hack itself.
nikto
(3,284 posts)Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,882 posts)the type of thing that needs to be carefully documented and strategized with lawyers. Im not a lawyer but I know they think ahead to make sure that any testimony holds up in court.... where it matters. Posting to facebook isn't going prove anything.
sheshe2
(87,623 posts)blueseas
(11,587 posts)Why is this not front page news????
33taw
(2,831 posts)Snarkoleptic
(6,029 posts)Flash forward to The February 15, 2005 Spring Primary in Waukesha. Over a period of about 3 months the voter roll ballooned from the 236K seen in the November 2004 Presidential Election up to 282,390. (source) So in the 8 months leading into the 2004 Presidential Election there was a marginal 1.3% increase in the rolls netting about 3000 additional new voters. However in the 3 months after the election, which showed an anomalous 97.63% turn out, suddenly the rolls surged to the tune of almost 50,000 new voters and upped the rolls 20%. I suppose that's one way to even out a suspiciously high turn out.
Furthermore, remember that first number I told you to hang on to? The 283,820 eligible voters in the county of Waukesha in July of 2004? This new surge in the voter rolls has now pushed total voter registration in Waukesha County to 99.5% of elegible voters being registered to vote by February of 2005. Sure stinks and sure has all the earmarks of election fraud.
LiberalFighter
(53,476 posts)blueseas
(11,587 posts)I am glad to keep this article for review.
Baitball Blogger
(48,124 posts)Who sends in an unsigned ballot and then votes in their precinct? Potential double fraud. The person who sent in the ballot, and the person who counted it.
flamingdem
(39,929 posts)They can for example send in ballots without the knowledge of the voter, perhaps.
Too many people and someone would squeal?
Baitball Blogger
(48,124 posts)and was allowed access mail in ballots that had been turned in, but were spoiled for some reason. He went in to correct them -- and was allowed to do it.
So, yes, I can see this being orchestrated. I can see a group sending ballots in without signatures, and people wittingly or unwittingly going in to the precinct to vote.
I can also see someone in the precinct recognizing that the ballots came in unsigned and an operative then calls the voter to tell him or her that their ballot was spoiled, and won't be counted; so why don't you come in and vote in the precinct
Either way, the person who is counting those ballots has committed fraud.
flamingdem
(39,929 posts)orleans
(35,023 posts)summerschild
(725 posts)I knew I remembered the name. I thought I remembered it associated with Walker's recall vote but when I googled it I found a whole series of claims over years with the county (and several on a clerk in that county over a period of several years).
All, of course, Republican.
I'd probably believe most anything is possible in Waukesha.
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,113 posts)... That! I have been warning concerned friends of the past in Waukesha and to keep their eyes on it, since before the election.
harun
(11,355 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)We have the third most Democrats in raw numbers of any county in the state, right behind Dane and Milwaukee. And we're engaged. We work the polls and are committed to election integrity.
NBachers
(18,143 posts)Kathy "Oh look I found more votes" Nickolouse is still up to her old tricks. I thought she'd be driven out in disgrace, but she's still there in Waukesha County.
http://www.politicususa.com/2012/06/05/kathy-nickolaus-found-votes-charge-waukesha-wi.html
flamingdem
(39,929 posts)This is the madness we're up against.
diane in sf
(4,090 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)She's clerk-treasurer for the Town of Waukesha - population < 9k.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waukesha_(town),_Wisconsin
dragonlady
(3,577 posts)She did not run for reelection after the last recount. The present clerk, however, is not all one would want to run a fair recount either.
bucolic_frolic
(47,066 posts)that walking around money
has won friends and influenced people
People in positions of power were and are on the take
Mc Mike
(9,171 posts)pansypoo53219
(21,736 posts)forgotmylogin
(7,678 posts)because DT himself was the first one to make such an issue of vote rigging, so that makes all the people filing to stop recounts and audits basically carry no weight. Although many of them, Trump included, tend to not even register self-hypocrisy.
nycbos
(6,366 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Quote:
These are serious accusations of improper behavior, which if proven true would represent criminal fraud. Were reaching out to Mr. West to determine what evidence he has in terms of documenting the behavior in question. But the mere fact that a Wisconsin observer is making these accusations is newsworthy in and of itself, as he claims to have witnessed all of the above with his own eyes. This is particularly notable in that Waukesha is one of just twelve Wisconsin counties (out of seventy-two) which have are refusing to a hand recount, instead relying on a machine recount.
PALMER REPORTS DESERVES OUR SUPPORT
flamingdem
(39,929 posts)Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)One of her favorite sayings that she still uses today is "those who scream the loudest about something they don't like are usually exactly what they don't like."
This is true.
Rabid homophobes are in the closest
Rabid racists usually have minority mistresses
Pro war idiots tend to never have served.
And, come to find out, the party that screams voter ID and voter fraud is the one who does it to most.
Who woulda fucking thunk it?
certainot
(9,090 posts)they've been yelling about non existent voter fraud sine they stole bush in and have been using as the pretext for passing voter suppression legislation all over the country. it also helps their election officials to rationalize their fraud. they've been yelling on those stations for months about obama and dems giving millions of 'illegals' drivers licenses that would allow them to vote.
which is what trump was blabbering about. and because dems ignore rw radio they get away with it.
and the U of Wisconsin supports 5 limbaugh stations and 2 hannity stations by broadcasting sports on them. so they help republicans all day, screaming about dem voter fraud (and global warming denial and defunding public ed) and will call for mobs to intimidate vote counters and judges, etc.
and they're doing it while flying the badger banner over their station.
that's fucked up.
wisconsinites can protest anything trump and republican at that university
dionysus
(26,467 posts)Ohioblue22
(1,430 posts)Quackers
(2,256 posts)Silver Gaia
(4,887 posts)of the original post on West's FB page. Looks legit. Hope it is. Also hope that West wasn't threatened or something. Weird. But he may have just made it private when he realized it was newsworthy.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Unsubstantiated claims with no basis in reality, rooted in an inability to accept a bitter defeat.
I've not heard it described more aptly.
47of74
(18,470 posts)For the first offense.
TheHak
(71 posts)But palmer report has a copy of it
http://www.palmerreport.com/news/waukesha-wisconsin-double-donald-trump/381/
Ford_Prefect
(8,202 posts)C Moon
(12,565 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,991 posts)I feel you C Moon
Docreed2003
(17,818 posts)In the days leading up to the election, in one of his many "rigged" diatribes, I'm pretty sure Trump encouraged voting twice by mailing in ballots and then voting I person as a means to counter supposed democratic vote rigging. I'll see if I can dig and find the article.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Madison if anyone knows anyone who can go ASAP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/108420162 Has details
LakeArenal
(29,822 posts)Wisconsin has known about it for years and nobody has done anything about it.. How did this happen to Wisconsin? Well, America it's about to happen to you!
Alekzander
(479 posts)AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)Buckle up, y'all!! The truth is coming!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Remember this?
One for you, one for me. I/I
Two for you, one two for me. II/I+II
Three for you, one two three for me. III/I+II+III
Four for you, one two three four for me. IIII/I+II+III+IIII
Etc.
TheHak
(71 posts)Aimee in OKC
(160 posts)KNOWN SECURITY CONCERNS:
*SECURITY SEALS = Ideally, the DS200s exposed ports, memory card access areas, ballot box doors and case seams would be covered with tamper-evident security seals. The integrity of these seals should be maintained at all times, and only breached under controlled, explained circumstances. Seals should be logged to maintain chain of custody of sensitive materials.
*THE MEMORY CARD IS SENSITIVE = Corrupt memory cards may be able to introduce viruses, cause the main election server to crash and falsify votes. Access to the memory card should be controlled, monitored and logged at all times.
*BALLOT BOX ACCESS =Optical scan systems have at least one and possible more ballot boxes. Each ballot box should be inspected by a voter at the beginning of voting to make sure that they are empty. These ballot boxes should locked and/or be sealed with tamper-evident tape.
*UNRESPONSIVE TOUCHSCREENS =During EAC testing on the Unity 3.2.1.0 voting system, some DS200s stopped responding to interactions with the user interface. The anomaly presented itself at random times during the testing process. ES&S informed the EAC that the root cause of touch screen unresponsiveness is linked to an improperly implemented internal system log. This log is only accessible to ES&S technicians when troubleshooting errors with the fielded system. {... .}
*CORRECT INKS = Some Optical Scan systems have trouble reading red inks or inks with red in them. Voters should use the writing instrument provided at the polling place or, if voting at home, black ballpoint pen that does not bleed through paper.
*SKEWED BALLOTS = During testing on the Unity 3.2.1.0, a DS200 did not count a valid mark for a race. The anomaly was discovered when county testers reviewed the printed election summary report for the DS200 unit. The count for a single contest did not match the expected results. The test was performed to verify that ES&S had corrected a previous anomaly with similar symptoms. The county testers were using a 17 ballot with contests concentrated in the lower sections of the ballot. {. . .} In the course of the review, the EAC found various degrees of ballot image distortion; with the 17 ballot having the largest degree of skew. The EAC is working with jurisdictions, VSTLs and the manufacturer to understand and resolve this issue.
During the EAC Certification process it was revealed that a DS200 coded for Election Day counting will not support more than 18 precincts, ...
https://www.verifiedvoting.org/resources/voting-equipment/ess/ds200/
Hekate
(94,789 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)flamingdem
(39,929 posts)Someone asked about why don't they video this so here it is..
Quackers
(2,256 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)make 'mistakes'. The recount people have a hard time even trying to recount this disorganized mess of Pa. votes.
iluvtennis
(20,884 posts)HelenWheels
(2,284 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)triron
(22,240 posts)UCmeNdc
(9,650 posts)Mc Mike
(9,171 posts)Vinca
(51,079 posts)Turbineguy
(38,411 posts)your cheating must be strong!
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Election theft is a bit like a perfect crime. Done "right" there is no going back, and no way to prove it happened short of a confession.
flamingdem
(39,929 posts)Not sure the legalities of getting that but for sure we need the ability to get that next time.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)UCmeNdc
(9,650 posts)Seasider
(182 posts)Basically telling people to vote more than once or something similar.
http://www.star-telegram.com/news/nation-world/national/article111519972.html
You even had a woman in Iowa trying to vote twice for Trump.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/10/29/trump-supporter-charged-with-voting-twice-in-iowa/?utm_term=.03db4b7be085
It may just be just isolated incidents but if enough people were doing that and not getting caught, it's enough to tip the scales of a close election.
Cyrusvirus
(15 posts)I had a feeling he won these states because Trump's followers voted by mail and then voted in person (just as Trump instructed them to do).
My stomach turned when I heard him say that to his followers because that I knew his rally goers would definetely do this and that would have definitely made him win these states no matter how blue they were. In fact, I wanted to sign up after the election to say this theory but it was hacked and I just recently was able to sign up. Unfortunately still haven't been able to start my own thread, so this is my first post venting out my frustration about it.
flamingdem
(39,929 posts)I think we're being ripped off and not enough dems are up in arms.
There are many ways to do it and you're right the one Trump told them to do is easy.
Welcome to DU (as a poster)
triron
(22,240 posts)I thought Clinton's lawyers were involved. Why don't we hear anything more about it??
And what about the machines that may have been illegally tampered with?
flamingdem
(39,929 posts)We don't have the resources needed - so some fights will be lost.
A shame when we see cold water being thrown by dems with so much at stake
dragonlady
(3,577 posts)He was at the training session for recount volunteers.