2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMust-read New Yorker essay: 'Now is the time to burn false equivalencies forever'
Now is the time to resist the slightest extension in the boundaries of what is right and just. Now is the time to speak up and to wear as a badge of honor the opprobrium of bigots. Now is the time to confront the weak core at the heart of Americas addiction to optimism; it allows too little room for resilience, and too much for fragility. Hazy visions of healing and not becoming the hate we hate sound dangerously like appeasement. The responsibility to forge unity belongs not to the denigrated but to the denigrators. The premise for empathy has to be equal humanity; it is an injustice to demand that the maligned identify with those who question their humanity.
cont
Yet, a day after the election, I heard a journalist on the radio speak of the vitriol between Obama and Trump. No, the vitriol was Trumps. Now is the time to burn false equivalencies forever. Pretending that both sides of an issue are equal when they are not is not balanced journalism; it is a fairy taleand, unlike most fairy tales, a disingenuous one.
cont
http://www.dailykos.com/
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Wounded Bear
(60,712 posts)TygrBright
(20,987 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)I should've said scroll down. Below is a link to the original article in the New Yorker
http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/now-is-the-time-to-talk-about-what-we-are-actually-talking-about
TygrBright
(20,987 posts)BeyondGeography
(40,023 posts)Thanks to Republican intimidation and their own fecklessness.
Between fake news, Faux News, morally bankrupt network CEOs like Zucker and Moonves, Nice Polite Republicans and the rest of the sellouts starting at the crack of dawn with Morning Joe, we really are up against it. And we still won the popular vote and more people still voted for Democratic candidates. Shows you just how much help the tyranny of the minority actually needs.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)...following the incident at Ohio State. The interviewee was being asked to explain why it is that 2 Somalis (from different parts of the US) had committed terrible crimes in recent months. The interviewee was quite polite. I would have said, "When's the last time you interviewed a white person in order to have that person speak for all white people in response to multiple white people committing the same sort of crime? Oh, you never have? Not once? Well, fuck off then."
BeyondGeography
(40,023 posts)The coddling of white people in this country (Ammon Bundy verdict, anyone?) and the corresponding social suffocation of nonwhites is so casual as to be ingrained. Thanks for the reminder.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)It's evident that many well-meaning people of DU need an education in oppression theory, systemic racism vs. individual attitudes, white privilege, etc.
But I admit that's a bit disheartening, because it's tough enough having to deal with the likes of those who vote for the likes of Trump.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Including this part:
Now is the time to elevate the art of questioning. Is the only valid resentment in America that of white males? If we are to be sympathetic to the idea that economic anxieties lead to questionable decisions, does this apply to all groups? Who exactly are the élite?
Now is the time to frame the questions differently. If everything remained the same, and Hillary Clinton were a man, would she still engender an overheated, outsized hostility? Would a woman who behaved exactly like Trump be elected? Now is the time to stop suggesting that sexism was absent in the election because white women did not overwhelmingly vote for Clinton. Misogyny is not the sole preserve of men.
The case for women is not that they are inherently better or more moral. It is that they are half of humanity and should have the same opportunitiesand be judged according to the same standardsas the other half. Clinton was expected to be perfect, according to contradictory standards, in an election that became a referendum on her likability.