Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Farmgirl1961

(1,643 posts)
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 06:07 PM Dec 2016

Palmer Report update:Michigan recount:officials admit majority of Detroit precincts have incorrect

Michigan recount: officials admit majority of Detroit precincts have incorrect ballot totals

Just one day after a federal judge ordered that the state of Michigan recount its ballots in the 2016 presidential election to check for accuracy, officials are now claiming they can’t recount the ballots in the most pivotal city, because they screwed up the process too thoroughly the first time around. In fact, by their own admission, the majority of precincts in Detroit had ballot totals in the precinct poll books which didn’t match those of the voting machines.


-snip-

http://www.palmerreport.com/?p=404
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
2. This isn't good as state law dictates that the affected precincts be disqualified
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 06:28 PM
Dec 2016

from the recount and the original totals to be used instead.

JustinL

(722 posts)
3. is Stein challenging this provision in federal court?
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 06:57 PM
Dec 2016

In Bush v Gore, the Supreme Court ruled that ballots cannot be subjected to "arbitrary and disparate treatment" during the recount process. I'm having a really hard time discerning any sort of rational basis for excluding these precincts from the recount.

KewlKat

(5,652 posts)
4. I wonder if this is of help? The judge that ordered the recount could help maybe?
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 06:58 PM
Dec 2016
And yet, as of this moment, Michigan is flat out insisting that the ballots in 392 of the 662 precincts in Detroit simply can’t be recounted. As if to bluntly underscore the embarrassing nature of the Michigan 2016 election situation, the elections director for the city of Detroit admitted to local newspaper The Detroit News that “It’s not good” and went on to explain that eighty-seven vote counting machines broke on election day. This should come as news to the federal judge who already mandated that the recount take place; if he chooses to, he can rule that the Michigan laws covering this matter are unconstitutional, and force these votes to be recounted in accordance with his original ruling.
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
6. Because Detroit election leaders screwed up?
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 07:28 PM
Dec 2016

I think they need to investigate what the heck happened in Detroit. Talk about voter disenfranchisement. This is wrong wrong wrong!

FBaggins

(27,740 posts)
10. I think the law is the problem in this case
Tue Dec 6, 2016, 11:41 PM
Dec 2016

Just look at the ongoing recount in WI as an example. It isn't uncommon for one out of every four or five precincts to have a small correction (usually one or two votes). It can almost always be reconciled in a recount... but in MI it blocks the recount!

It's likely that the issue will be moot (though still fodder for conspiracy theories) soon... but that law needs to be corrected.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Palmer Report update:Mich...