2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSamantha Bee: identity politics is the dismissive term for what we used to call civil rights
http://www.vox.com/2016/12/13/13936226/samantha-bee-identity-politics-democratsIdentity politics is the dismissive term for what we used to call civil rights and equality, Bee said on her December 12 show. Also, she made sure to add, white and male is an identity, as is being Christian the two fronts Steve Doocys Fox News roundtable and other like-minded media outlets feel are most under attack.
Basically, as Voxs Matt Yglesias put it: There is no other way to do politics than to do identity politics.
Whats more, Bee said, standing up for civil rights can, and did, win Democrats elections. You know what happens when Democrats stand up for transgender rights? They win, she said, pointing to North Carolinas gubernatorial race, which was recently called for Democrat Roy Cooper over Republican incumbent Pat McCrory, a staunch supporter of the states discriminatory anti-LGBTQ laws.
Also, why i will never trust any Democrat or Du'er who is dismissive about 'identity politics' aka 'social justice issues' etc.
LexVegas
(6,578 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,443 posts)its way. People who used this term willy nilly in this election cycle have earned my scorn, and I'll never trust them.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)package...and part of what you are selling as a candidate and message. But is she unintentionally implying with her logic that Clinton lost because of not enough identity politics? Besides, standing up for people's civil rights and being in favor of a big diverse and inspiring tent is not running on identity politics in the same way that some have used the term. When Sanders says we can't just run on them, he's referring specifically to a candidate emphasizing that quality while subsuming any platform on actual policies that will help people of these identities and the American people at large. We can disagree whether or not that happened in Clinton's campaign, but at the very least we need to know what we're talking about when we say "identity politics" and it sounds like we have different definitions.
But yes, saying "When you fight for things that people can believe in you win" is a good argument. It misses the realities of corporate media influence and all the candidates who lose when fighting for those things, so I assume she's oddly enough, talking about the Democratic Party at large, which has often been tepid on social and economic issues(as in coming late to the movements as the wind blows), in a kind of nudging way.
Or maybe somebody else can unravel this for me.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)as merely 'identity politics'.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)No, Not Samantha Bee.
More divide and conquer BS by the mainstream media. They are mischaracterizing a criticism levied by Sanders and others into something entirely different, and not just gleefully mauling that message, but joyfully bludgeoning the DNC for caring about diversity and social justice.
uponit7771
(91,801 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)JCanete
(5,272 posts)killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)It's really baffling to me watching so many articles and posts pitting them against each other.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)pnwmom
(109,578 posts)As BS has done more than once.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)marybourg
(13,191 posts)is what we used to call civility.
George II
(67,782 posts)...of the term "identity politics" until maybe two months ago.
She's great, and amazing that it takes a Canadian to "tell it like it is"!
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)apparently beating up on civil rights is the cool millennial thing to do
George II
(67,782 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Lucky Luciano
(11,443 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,840 posts)with Richard Nixon and his "Southern Strategy" designed to appeal to working class whites at the expense of working class blacks and other minorities.
Eric J in MN
(35,620 posts)Last edited Tue Dec 13, 2016, 06:44 PM - Edit history (1)
...of ordinary people.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)movements.
it has nothing to do with 'traits of candidates'
George II
(67,782 posts)Whoever told you that was selling you something. If you didn't pull that out of somewhere yourself.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)TomCADem
(17,764 posts)If you say something that is racist or sexist, then you are praised for being truthful and telling it like it is, rather than being condemned for being a racist or sexist.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Gothmog
(154,644 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)SunSeeker
(53,735 posts)Parker DeWitt
(28 posts)Identity politics is when you vote for (or against someone) because of who they are -- regardless of their qualifications for office. Usually, it refers to when people vote for someone who looks like them or shares some kind of identity with them.
So, when an Irish person votes for the unqualified Irish candidate solely because he's Irish, that's identity politics. The same goes for Christians, blacks, LGBT, women, you name it. When you ignore qualifications and vote for identity, that's identity politics.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Response to ehrnst (Reply #35)
ehrnst This message was self-deleted by its author.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)And how abandoning us will be STUPID.
"Invite white working class to the party, but don't let them take over the DJ table."
Sounds like common sense to me.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)despite the rantings of some that she defeated.
Hekate
(94,789 posts)brer cat
(26,317 posts)BumRushDaShow
(142,669 posts)There seems to be a lack of comprehension from some that for many marginalized groups including POC, LGBTQ,and others, "economics" becomes irrelevant when skin color or gender association come into play. The wealthiest of the wealthiest POC are treated just as harshly as the poorest. This should be obvious based on the way our current President and his family have been treated - notably in an unprecedented and outright disgusting manner.
Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)Oklahoma is in the midst of a decision to put up anti-abortion warning signs in public areas, like bathrooms. Tell me how we are supposed to use economics to prevent that kind of shit? Just things like jobs doesn't prevent social apartheid on the basis of gender, race, orientation, and religion.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Lucky Luciano
(11,443 posts)BainsBane
(54,806 posts)Claiming attention to the concerns of anyone but white men is divisive. KellyAnne picked that up again after a well-known politician decried identity politics. She was actually insisting Clinton's campaign was divisive because of identity politics, while she refused to admit that Trump's endless racist comments were.
TheFrenchRazor
(2,116 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Cha
(305,481 posts)Same here.. mahalo, Lioness
BlueMTexpat
(15,500 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)And being a SJW is a GOOD thing.