2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI really don't understand the boomlet for Tom Perez as DNC head.
I have nothing but mad respect for his tenure in the DoL and DOJ, and his career of advocating as an attorney for progressive causes.
But, I do wonder what qualifies him to be in charge of our election-winning efforts.
His entire experience in electoral politics is this:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/author/secretary-thomas-e-perez
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure he did a great job during his single term on the Montgomery County+ (Maryland) Council, but what insight does he have into building a political party and winning elections in statewide contests or for Congress, including in areas like the Great Lakes and Great Plains?
+Montgomery County is an affluent suburb of Washington, D.C.
msongs
(70,197 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Barack Obama.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)Makes DU feel normal, almost old-timey after all this hillary nonsense...
mcar
(43,528 posts)I think Ellison is a good Rep. I just think we need a full time person at the DNC helm.
And I have no problem protecting Obama's legacy.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)for a Congressional district that does not match his demographic profile, to understate things.
He's had exposure at all levels to the big game.
mcar
(43,528 posts)I don't see how that gives him exposure to the big game.
Again, I respect the man. I just don't see how he can serve his constituents and run the DNC at the same time. We need a 50 state strategy.
FogerRox
(13,211 posts)I'm a member of my local committee, and the level of decline is appalling.
We need a 3142 county strategy. Municipal Chairs don't have access to fundraising call lists or email lists via NGP VAN votebuilder platform.
At least Ellison has spoken to these problems, no other candidate has.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(121,018 posts)if he gets the DNC job. That means we get a special election to replace him in MN CD5 - I hope with another good progressive.
HoneyBadger
(2,297 posts)Not sure what that means. Small donors? Small town? Anti corporation?
rogue emissary
(3,216 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)if more outside the beltway types announced their candidacies.
rogue emissary
(3,216 posts)It's really going to come down to their vision and focus. Experience and or even a proven track record isn't going to count for much this year.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)who worked their way as a precinct chairman, county chairman and now a successful state chairman. That person would know the job and only have one job.
rogue emissary
(3,216 posts)I'd prefer an organizer from the grass routes. Be that a known or relatively unknown candidate.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)aidbo
(2,328 posts)hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)He is a good speaker and good at messaging. I think he will be an excellent foil to the GOP on shows and get our messaging on track.
I like Ellison, but with him it's all going to be about his history with Nation of Islam and I'm afraid people will tune him out.
Ligyron
(7,899 posts)It shouldn't be of course but it is. Plus he's brown, sorry.
Once Trump and gang's policy starts to do real damage to those who voted for him, they'll be as open to a properly crafted Dem message as they're ever going to be. At that point we need someone who looks like them to speak to their concerns and they won't trust anyone who isn't.
Fk'd up I know, but if we can get them back into the tent, we can work on their other issues later.
Me.
(35,454 posts)He's not Ellison and for the people who are tired of BS' influence that says a lot
Gothmog
(154,644 posts)I will not support a sanders supporter for DNC chair. I strongly like Tom Perez. He is a class act
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Enforcing that would mean accepting the loss of most young people as volunteers, staffers, and future Democratic candidates.
We can't anathemize the Sanders movement and still have any significant appeal to people under 35 or so. They'll just stay away from us.
Gothmog
(154,644 posts)Your attempts to ignore Sanders rolr in thiis election is sad. Sanders ran for the sake of his own ego and had no chance of being the nominee. I will not support a sanders supporter ad head of the DNC
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Bernie's never been about ego...if he was, he'd wear expensive clothes and get expensive haircuts.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)Not all of us do it through haircuts and clothes.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Again, though...why is it so hard to accept that it was simply the issues that prompted Bernie's decision to run?
His candidacy was never driven by opposition to the idea of a woman being president-if he had an issue with THAT, why would he have started out, before he decided to run, trying to get Elizabeth Warren to get into the race?
It's not as though Hillary's campaign started out on a set of proposals no one had any reason to feel were insufficient
And, even without embracing "socialism" Bernie's own proposals were the mildest possible version of social demcracy, the guy was far from a "Red" in the Cold War sense), Hillary could probably have seen him off early in the race if she had incorporated the need to stand up to corporate power into her program.
Bernie's candidacy didn't cause the Trump EC victory.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)When it was clear he was losing, instead of getting his bros to harass superdelegates. I also wish he didn't attack Hillary as corrupt, something Obama didn't do even though their fight was much more narrow.
Doesn't matter now. Neither his priorities or mine are going to get ahead in the next four years.
Gothmog
(154,644 posts)The math here is clear and you are ignoring the delegate lead that Clinton had after the Super Tuesday/March 1 primaries. In the real world, it was clear that Sanders had no chance of overcoming that lead. The fact that you are ignoring this delegate lead is amusing to me. Sanders did not appeal to African American and latino voters and so had no chance of being the nominee. The race was really over after Super Tuesday but Sanders kept on attacking Clinton even though in the real world he had no chance of making up that differential . This differential was in pledged delegates and not super delegates.
At the end Sanders was reduced to begging for the support of super delegates because that was the only way that Sanders could overcome the delegate lead that Clinton built up early on. The fact that Sanders and his supporters did not realize that Sanders has no chance of being the nominee is sad to me. I saw this at the National Convention where a group of some of the younger Sanders supporters came into the delegation breakfast/meeting to demand that we condemn Hillary Clinton and vote for Sanders.
In the real world math matters. Your posts are ignoring the math and the facts here. Sanders' campaign was based on his personal vanity and not on facts or any realistic chance of being the nominee. As noted in your post, the nomination was locked up in many cases far earlier because the candidates in these races were not running a campaign based on personal vanity but looked at the math. If Sanders cared about the math, he would have dropped out in March or April because the math was clear that Sanders had no chance.
Your posts does not help your argument.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)It's beyond childish.
Response to Gothmog (Reply #12)
BlueProgressive This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,443 posts)blm
(113,829 posts)chair for the DNC. Perez has excellent communication skills, organizational skills, intellect, and wit - and that is no small matter.
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)I personally prefer Ellison to Perez because of the experience differential.
Ace Rothstein
(3,299 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Howard Dean was willing and he doesn't need on the job training.
So let's pick a guy who won't even address the trash that came out of his mouth a while back and who already has a job.
firerises
(14 posts)He withdrew himself because he actually rather be earning money in a lobbying position than helping us so I don't know why you're going on about him.
He'd be the best candidate but he opens himself up to easy attack.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)by talking smack when he was younger and he doesn't have the guts to address it now.
firerises
(14 posts)Talking smack as a kid? You think people really care about that?
Releasing Tax Records? He wasn't ever the nominee.
Tainted by Lobbying. Yeah. Lobbyists are one of the most hated entities in America. More so than people who talk smack or don't release their taxes when running for office. Are you that out of touch with what average Americans think?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)StevieM
(10,541 posts)Congratulations on your thousandth post. You might want to do something special for it, like put up your own post talking about something important to you. It can be anything, from your love for Bernie Sanders to your ideas for combatting climate change.
Forgive me if you already knew about that option, I just wanted to point out the opportunity to you, in case you weren't familiar with it.
Plenty of people, like myself, who didn't want Bernie to be our nominee, or become president, don't consider ourselves to be "anti-Bernie." I like Bernie and think he has made a valuable contribution. I also like his record as Mayor of Burlington.
As for Keith Ellison, I don't think that people who oppose him are primarily concerned with the fact that he endorsed Sanders in the Democratic primary. If Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon was running I don't think he would face too much opposition. The issue with Ellison--fairly or not--is over his position on Israel.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)There's just too much against Ellison. I like him and I obviously liked his stance on Bernie but that will be a drag for a vocal few. Then there's the ADL.
Personally I think Perez is laying the ground work for something else.
oasis
(51,713 posts)SaschaHM
(2,897 posts)He brings the experience of having run and managed a large bureaucracy full of many tiny parts which mirrors what the DNC needs to do in every state/congressional district. That more than qualifies him to lead the DNC as it rebuilds and expands it operations to compete with the RNC in my opinion.
Cha
(305,481 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,375 posts)I'm honestly not sure what Ellison's record is on getting others elected is either. Both bring many gifts to the table.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Ellison to me gets the edge (at this point) because he has won multiple primary and general elections--state legislature as well as Congress.
Vinca
(51,079 posts)At this point I don't know who would be good for the job. I was supporting Dean because of his 50 state strategy and his history of winning, but I realize we need to start tapping a new generation.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Perez seems like a good administrator, and I think that might be just what we need in a DNC chair.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I hope he runs for governor in Maryland.
Cha
(305,481 posts)#TeamPerez he has the qualifications, experience, intelligence, leadership & bilingual. He represents the people with a proven track record.
https://twitter.com/algiordano
Tom Watson Verified account
?@tomwatson
"the most important U.S. labor secretary since Frances Perkins" - great Tom Perez profile http://prospect.org/article/subtle-force-tom-perez
https://twitter.com/tomwatson/status/809239536924524544
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,778 posts)but is Dean in the running again?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,778 posts)but I hadn't heard anything more about him running for DNC chair, so I began wondering if he was in/out of the running. I'm kind of disappointed because the Party did good under his leadership. Not sure yet who I'm going to support but whoever we do has a LOT of work to do to try to rehabilitate the party at the state level.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,778 posts)n/t
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)This is an area where we should be vetting heavily. Thanks for the info.
Renew Deal
(82,932 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I have no problem with any elements of the above. Just not sure it means he knows how to win elections.
Renew Deal
(82,932 posts)I have no idea what qualifies him, but after the ADL stuff they'll take anyone.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)the very faction we are seeking to attract.
also, he is highly likeable
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Same reason I was skeptical of him as a VP choice.
I hope he runs for governor of Maryland. He'd be an outstanding governor.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)i think it needs strategic thinking and good relationships with key dem groups like minorities and labor and women's rights groups.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)DNC head has one job--to help Democrats win more elections. To the extent they need to think strategically, they need to think strategically about how to win a lot more elections outside the urban archipelago.
Party's most pressing problem is with WWC voters, especially in Great Lakes area states.
Not just talking President, also talking about our ability to win Congress, state legislatures, etc.
Does he have any idea what to do about that?
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)this is a management strategy job, he himself is never going to go out in the field.
Cha
(305,481 posts)for Gov of Maryland.. he still wants to be of service post Cabinet position.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)so how's he going to come up for a strategy in a field in which has no depth of experience?
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #64)
La Lioness Priyanka This message was self-deleted by its author.
mcar
(43,528 posts)The problems are: voter suppression, turnout among the base and younger voters, pushing money and resources into state races, and dealing with a corrupt media.
LeftInTX
(30,037 posts)Cha
(305,481 posts)DeminPennswoods
(16,325 posts)I like them both, but look at how the media went wild with the Clinton email stuff. What do you think will happen with Ellison and his defense of Farrakahn even though it was 20+ years ago? It's not a big deal to me because people learn and grow, but the charge has a good chance to derail whatever message Dems try to get across. Perez doesn't have that baggage and he's just as progressive. Further, there's no reason Ellison can't also be involved in whatever the DNC does. He can certainly help shape the DNC with his organizing/grassroots/political expertise.
tritsofme
(18,577 posts)I stand with the ADL, he is disqualified.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Yes, he supported Farrakhan years ago, but, like Malcolm X before him, moved away from the Nation of Islam over time.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)of unquestioned support for Israel. No matter how many UN Resolutions it violates, no matter how many illegal settlements are placed on Palestinian land, support for the Israeli State is a given for both parties.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)..what would the Republicans say?
( )
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)On paper Perez seems to be well established in comparison. I really need to know more about both and hope some others join the mix.
Gothmog
(154,644 posts)This article from Perez has one of the main reasons why I am supporting Perez. I am an election law junkie and I have volunteered a great deal in voter protection efforts. During the Bush administration, the Civil Rights Section and the Voting Rights division of the Civil Rights section of the DOJ was destroyed by the bushies. Partisan hacks were placed in non partisan slots illegally including an idiot named Christian Adams who spearheaded the New Black Panther silliness.
AG Holder and Tom Perez rebuilt the Civil Rights section of the DOJ and the voting rights division. They did a great job and Perez was the lead of the Civil Rights division when he was promoted to Sec. of Labor. This is from Perez's article on why he is running https://mic.com/articles/162459/tom-perez-dnc-chair#.K1AO41GLd
Years later, I led the department's civil rights division as we pushed for progress across the country. We went toe to toe with Republican leaders in states like Texas who want to turn back the clock on voting rights; we stood up to rogue sheriffs like Joe Arpaio who want to immigrant-bait and immigrant-bash; we cracked down on police misconduct and held police departments accountable to their responsibility to uphold the Constitution while protecting communities; we worked aggressively to enforce laws protecting women's access to reproductive health services; and we fought for marriage equality in every state.
GOP voter suppression will be a major issue for the DNC and Perez is the best person to deal with this issue. I have volunteered in voter protection efforts for a long time and Perez is clearly the best person to fight GOP voter suppression
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Too
Demsrule86
(71,024 posts)put in charge of the DNC.
George II
(67,782 posts)....who isn't part of the "establishment" or part of the "problem".
So, what's the problem with Perez, since you point out that he hasn't been in Washington for a long time?
You're presenting (vaguely conflicting) points against him, but haven't stated who might be better.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Perez would be a fine gubernatorial candidate but he's not shown any political chops.