2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBillionaires Suffer as Tax Shelters Go Away
Its hard out there for a tax-sheltering billionaire. Bloomberg News reports today that some of the wealthiest people in the world are scrambling to rearrange their financial affairs as international tax shelters become less accommodating.
Liechtenstein began in 2009 to require its financial institutions to gather details about the beneficial (i.e. real) owners of all accounts held there. Andorra and Switzerland made their own concessions within a day of Liechtenstein.
Singapore will make laundering of profits from tax evasion a crime under a law taking effect on July 1.
Luxembourg announced on April 10 that it would end its bank secrecy policy in 2015.
Cyprus has been required by the European Union to impose a tax on bank deposits of more than 100,000.
Jersey, the island in the English Channel thats a Crown dependency of Britain, is under pressure to change its tax-secrecy laws. In response, it has threatened to sever its ties with Britain.
Libertarians argue that these crackdowns could be a bad thing. They say international tax shelters are good for economic growth worldwide because they discourage growth-destroying overtaxation. Simply stated, it is very difficult for governments to impose and enforce confiscatory tax rates when investors and entrepreneurs can shift their economic activity to jurisdictions with better tax policy, Dan Mitchell, an economist and senior fellow at the Cato Institute, wrote in a Room for Debate column at nytimes.com earlier this month.
Other economists support cracking down on small nations that attract rich people and companies with low tax rates and bank secrecy. They argue that tax-shelter countries are parasites. The full or partial elimination of tax havens would improve welfare in non-haven countries, in part because countries would be induced to increase their tax rates, which they have set at inefficiently low levels in an attempt to attract mobile capital, wrote University of Michigan economist Joel Slemrod and Michigan State University economist John Wilson in a 2006 working paper.
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-04-29/billionaires-suffer-as-tax-shelters-go-away

CincyDem
(7,024 posts)meow2u3
(25,093 posts)Cry me a river, billionaires.
Special Prosciuto
(731 posts)ruffburr
(1,190 posts)So bad for these self entitled pricks that i can not refrain from
ChazInAz
(2,857 posts)LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)when they only receive about $90 million a year through their investments?
They should be in our shoes.
Kablooie
(18,866 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)Maybe I have empathy deficit disorder, but eff em.
yellowcanine
(36,399 posts)Cookies anyone?
Addison
(299 posts)As we speak their accountants are devising new ways to avoid rendering unto Caesar what is Caesar's. And singing that old song . . .
"Oh, no, not I, I will survive
Oh, as long as I know how to love, I know I'll stay alive
I've got all my life to live, I've got all my love to give
And I'll survive, I will survive, oh . . ."
csziggy
(34,189 posts)DFW
(57,502 posts)....if he or she has some painful medical condition that cannot be alleviated by medication.
Otherwise, I have a hard time accepting that someone who has a billion dollars, free and clear, is suffering from anything other than the thought of not being able to order a new transcontinental jet on a yearly basis any more.