Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Owners of America
Established in 1975, Gun Owners of America believes that even the far-right National Rifle Association is too moderate and open to compromise on the issue of gun rights. GOA has emerged as a vocal opponent of gun violence prevention measures thanks to its close alliances with Republican lawmakers and its tendencyunlike the NRAnot to go into hiding after mass shootings.
GOA is currently under the leadership of Erich Pratt, but it was led for decades by his father, Larry Pratt, now the Virginia-based groups executive director emeritus. Under Larry Pratts leadership, GOA became a bridge between conservative lawmakers and the radical anti-government militia movement, linking guns to issues such as Christian nationalism and opposition to immigration reform. Much like the NRA, GOA promotes bizarre conspiracy theories and racial rhetoric in order to stir up panic about crime waves and imminent government seizures of firearms.
And from an associated article at the same site:
GOA has circulated a petition to its members claiming that Obamas nominee, Merrick Garland, would reverse your ability to own a gun and hates the Second Amendment, basing its claims on exceedingly thin evidence. While these attacks on Garlands record have been widely discredited, several Republican senators have pointed to the judges supposed disrespect for the Second Amendment as a reason to oppose him.
GOAs general counsel, Michael Hammond, brought these claims to an op-ed in USA Today on Sunday, which GOA followed up with a video claiming again that Garland hates the Second Amendment and that if he gets on the court good people will go to prison for exercising their constitutional rights. Obamas nomination of Garland, the video warns, is the most significant step in his sordid trail towards transforming our nation.
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/gop-taking-supreme-court-orders-from-radical-gun-group/
GOA is currently under the leadership of Erich Pratt, but it was led for decades by his father, Larry Pratt, now the Virginia-based groups executive director emeritus. Under Larry Pratts leadership, GOA became a bridge between conservative lawmakers and the radical anti-government militia movement, linking guns to issues such as Christian nationalism and opposition to immigration reform. Much like the NRA, GOA promotes bizarre conspiracy theories and racial rhetoric in order to stir up panic about crime waves and imminent government seizures of firearms.
And from an associated article at the same site:
GOA has circulated a petition to its members claiming that Obamas nominee, Merrick Garland, would reverse your ability to own a gun and hates the Second Amendment, basing its claims on exceedingly thin evidence. While these attacks on Garlands record have been widely discredited, several Republican senators have pointed to the judges supposed disrespect for the Second Amendment as a reason to oppose him.
GOAs general counsel, Michael Hammond, brought these claims to an op-ed in USA Today on Sunday, which GOA followed up with a video claiming again that Garland hates the Second Amendment and that if he gets on the court good people will go to prison for exercising their constitutional rights. Obamas nomination of Garland, the video warns, is the most significant step in his sordid trail towards transforming our nation.
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/gop-taking-supreme-court-orders-from-radical-gun-group/
This is the right-wing extremist armed sub-culture that is driving Trump's followers, advisors, and apologists. Just like those "moderates" who voted for this wannabe dictator, those who claim to be Democrats but parrot the exact same rhetoric as Larry and Erich Pratt are just as guilty of helping the right-wing spread hate and violence in this country.
A distinct majority of millions of rational, sane Democrats and Independents strongly support sensible gun control measures, and are disgusted by the right-wing attempts to divide this nation along cultural, race, religious, and regional lines in the sand.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 3190 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gun Owners of America (Original Post)
billh58
Dec 2016
OP
flamin lib
(14,559 posts)1. The ability of gunners to suspend rational thought about guns is amazing and confusing to me.
Any claim, no matter how ludicrous is immediately accepted at face value. Every year for eight years the fringe says Obama is coming for your guns and they believe it despite the fact that he actually expanded gun rights.
billh58
(6,641 posts)2. Excerpt from an article that I came across:
This originally appeared on ProPublica.
Chip Berlet has spent the past four decades studying right-wing political movements as a writer, activist and scholar. Now retired, he worked for many years as a senior analyst at Political Research Associates, a think tank based in the Boston area.
- Snip -
What are you most concerned about at this moment?
Even before the election you had the armed occupation at the federal preserve in Oregon. A few days ago you have this guy walking into the pizza place in D.C. There are armed people who think that liberals and gay people and Jews and Mexicans and Muslims are an existential threat to the constitution of the United States. They hear this every day on AM radio, every day on the internet, every day from some of their pastors.
At some point its going to slip one way or another: either we will slip back towards a consensus that armed violence is not a solution, or armed violence will grow.
Ive never said that before This is different. These are self-motivating armed people seeking to stop evil with guns.
http://www.salon.com/2016/12/21/as-a-white-nationalist-what-do-you-do-a-conversation-with-a-scholar-of-americas-extreme-right_partner/
Chip Berlet has spent the past four decades studying right-wing political movements as a writer, activist and scholar. Now retired, he worked for many years as a senior analyst at Political Research Associates, a think tank based in the Boston area.
- Snip -
What are you most concerned about at this moment?
Even before the election you had the armed occupation at the federal preserve in Oregon. A few days ago you have this guy walking into the pizza place in D.C. There are armed people who think that liberals and gay people and Jews and Mexicans and Muslims are an existential threat to the constitution of the United States. They hear this every day on AM radio, every day on the internet, every day from some of their pastors.
At some point its going to slip one way or another: either we will slip back towards a consensus that armed violence is not a solution, or armed violence will grow.
Ive never said that before This is different. These are self-motivating armed people seeking to stop evil with guns.
http://www.salon.com/2016/12/21/as-a-white-nationalist-what-do-you-do-a-conversation-with-a-scholar-of-americas-extreme-right_partner/
How far can "gun rights" be expanded before Mad Max becomes a reality? At what point do Americans call bullshit and say enough is enough? The Second Amendment was not written to give Americans the "right" to kill each other, nor to provide for vigilante justice.
Truth321
(93 posts)3. If only Hillary had won.
She could have put in supreme court justices that could have put new light on this gun issue