Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
Sat Jan 14, 2017, 02:50 PM Jan 2017

A recent study on gun purchases and background checks shows that 20% of purchases in the last two

years were made without a background check. The gunners are all over this, saying that gun violence prevention advocates are liars. Back in 1994 a study of the same subject reported that 40% of gun purchases were without a background check so obviously we proponents of sensible gun laws were making stuff up, right? No, not so much.

So why the discrepancy between the two studies? What a difference two decades make! Since the first study in 1994 a number of states have passed universal background check laws that require private sales to go through a licensed dealer for the NICS check.

From the study abstract:

Results:
22% (95% CI, 16% to 27%) of gun owners who reported obtaining their most recent firearm within the previous 2 years reported doing so without a background check. For firearms purchased privately within the previous 2 years (that is, other than from a store or pawnshop, including sales between individuals in person, online, or at gun shows), 50% (CI, 35% to 65%) were obtained without a background check. This percentage was 26% (CI, 5% to 47%) for owners residing in states regulating private firearm sales and 57% (CI, 40% to 75%) for those living in states without regulations on private firearm sales.

http://annals.org/aim/article/2595892/firearm-acquisition-without-background-checks-results-national-survey


So, enough states have passed universal background checks to bring the reported 1994 40% rate down to 20% because states with universal background checks dragged the average down.

Of course the NRA/ILA can't admit this so they spin the new findings into an accusation of lying. They also can't admit that the average avoidance of background checks in states without universal background checks is 57%.

It's all about 'telling the truth attractively' or more to the point outright blatant lying.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A recent study on gun purchases and background checks shows that 20% of purchases in the last two (Original Post) flamin lib Jan 2017 OP
Gun extremists lie? billh58 Jan 2017 #1

billh58

(6,641 posts)
1. Gun extremists lie?
Sat Jan 14, 2017, 04:10 PM
Jan 2017

With all of them being so law-abiding and responsible it's hard to believe that they would lie about background checks. Why I hear that the more hate groups and racists that have guns, the faster the crime rate is going down. You don't suppose that these upright NRA/ILA citizens lied about that too do you?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»A recent study on gun pur...