Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This guy's vertical is insane (Original Post) Mosby Feb 2023 OP
Spud Webb won the slam dunk contest some years ago. House of Roberts Feb 2023 #1
Nate Robinson Was 5'9" ProfessorGAC Feb 2023 #3
He's only 24. Still has time to improve. nt Mosby Feb 2023 #5
I Agree, Sort Of ProfessorGAC Feb 2023 #6
read about this, but no vid or height. thanks. pansypoo53219 Feb 2023 #2
NO prob Mosby Feb 2023 #4

ProfessorGAC

(69,894 posts)
3. Nate Robinson Was 5'9"
Mon Feb 20, 2023, 08:22 AM
Feb 2023

You are correct about Webb's height. Pretty sure he's the shortest to win the contest.
I think McLeung is the 4th shortest. Pretty sure Dee Brown was shorter.
But, none of those guys were doing the tricks McLeung did.
He not only jumps high, but his understanding of angles & take off points is superb. (Former high-flier here, so I understand).
Also, he has the ability to use his horizontal speed to load up for vertical height. His standing vertical is an impressive 44+ inches, but on that 540 dunk he got 49.5 inches off the ground.
I wish someone could have improved his shot & his defensive instincts. He'd be full time in the league if they did.

ProfessorGAC

(69,894 posts)
6. I Agree, Sort Of
Mon Feb 20, 2023, 02:46 PM
Feb 2023

He certainly can improve his shot. He can add a step of range, improve his accuracy, but his biggest need is a quicker delivery. He takes too long from commitment to release. He doesn't have to be Curry, who does it in the blink of an eye, but needs to be quicker.
He's spent his whole life being able to get to the rim any time he wanted, so these things weren't needed, hence never learned.
On the D side, however, I have greater concerns. He, like other pro prospects and even NBA guys (Ben Gordon comes to mind) has horrible defensive instincts. He doesn't anticipate well, he gets lost on screens, and he's not strong enough to fight through them. It's not lack of effort. He's not a lazy defender. He's just bad at it.
Gordon never got better & it shortened his career, and he WAS a shooter who create his own space.
This concerns me greatly about Matt. With his offensive attack game, he'd be 9n an NBA team right now in a full contract. But, he's not. It's not useful to score 25 then give up 33.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Basketball»This guy's vertical is in...