Distrust fuels populist movement

[RiverLover]

Distrust fuels populist movement
1/3/15

The Washington political classes do not understand you.

If you are a Democrat, they assume you're a pure progressive. They take for granted that you consider climate change a religion, think immigration should be a free pass for everyone, support entry-level people jumping past entry-level pay, think fairness is an entitlement provided by government through executive order, and believe socialized health care is the greatest achievement this country has accomplished.

If you are a Republican, they assume that you carry a gun every time you walk out the door, that you hate women, gays, blacks and Hispanics, and that you regularly attend tea party meetings to plot how to overthrow the government.

If you are a libertarian, they think you smoke pot — and that is about all they've got on you.

If you're an independent, you basically are a pain in their egos because you mess up their “conventional wisdom” or “smart takes” and make it harder and harder to accurately predict elections from their environmentally friendly “green” offices and coffeehouses in the District of Columbia and New York City.

In short, they believe too much of their own writing and social-media quips; they are so disconnected from normal Americans' lives that they fail to understand who we are, so they go with self-created stereotypes instead.

Here's the thing: No one is as black-and-white in their views as divisional politics have tried to pigeonhole us as being. In fact, Americans are pretty solidly center-right on fiscal and military issues and pretty moderate on social issues.

Blacks and whites are tired of Washington media pushing stories that white people are inherently racist (as if they're children and can't help themselves) along with the equally false narrative that all blacks are angry at all white people.

Across the political divide, people are tired of how they are portrayed in the media.

All Main Street Democrats are not Occupy Wall Street hippies, after all.

And, once and for all, the authentic tea party movement — before that movement was co-opted by political circus barkers trying to make a buck off folks' fears by running unprepared, unqualified wealthy candidates, or by politicians looking to make themselves more visible on cable TV — ended in November 2010. There is no king or queen of the tea party movement; you cannot crown a leader of something that does not exist anymore.

But a movement is out there. Populism is alive and humming across America...

...Based on the distrust that movement's followers have for Washington and its media, it is incredibly unclear how this will all play out. And anyone who tells you differently is lying.


http://triblive.com/opinion/salena/7485376-74/media-movement-political

[Demeter]

1. but what I really, really hate is....Generalizations!

[RiverLover]

2. That's the point the author is making.

Brilliant writing. Not like whereisjustice, but its good stuff.

[sabrina 1]

3. Things are changing. Across the political spectrum. This article is catching a wave, the same

way political forums caught one in 2000. But that when partisanship was 'in'. You were either FOR Bush or against him.

Bush's excesses, wars and war crimes, the 2000 election, torture, lies etc made it easy to be on the 'right team' with the only goal being to get them out of office.

Since then with the realization of that goal, people have had a chance to see how the system actually works, on all sides.

But a movement is out there. Populism is alive and humming across America...

...Based on the distrust that movement's followers have for Washington and its media, it is incredibly unclear how this will all play out. And anyone who tells you differently is lying.

Yes, things are stirring and those in power are getting nervous.

Good article, the worst fear of those in power is that the people will unite against them. Keeping them divided ensures they hold on to their ill-gotten powers.

To use another OWS slogan, they had some great ones:

'The people, united, will never be defeated'

Which is why they tried to force OWS into becoming political. So that they could, as this author proves, place them on one team or another and then dismiss them.

[tavalon]

4. LOL

Especially when he completely describes me and then calls me a democrat. I'm a socialist. If you're going to generalize about me, then at least get the title right.

[Enthusiast]

5. I agree with many points. They don't understand you and they could give a fuck about it.

"All Main Street Democrats are not Occupy Wall Street hippies, after all."

Right. But. A huge majority of Democrats want to hold the Wall Street thieves accountable. And that was also the main objective of the OWS movement.