Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

babylonsister

(171,799 posts)
Thu Jun 15, 2023, 07:50 AM Jun 2023

New York Times makes 'MOMENTOUS' blunder covering Trump's arrest [View all]

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/6/14/2175369/-The-New-York-Times-covers-Donald-Trump-s-arrest-by-boosting-Trump

New York Times makes 'MOMENTOUS' blunder covering Trump's arrest
Wednesday, June 14, 2023 at 1:32:14p EDT
By Hunter


On Tuesday, for the very first time in the nation's history, a former president of the United States was arrested for stealing classified national security secrets, hiding them from government officials, and obstructing government efforts to get them back.

It is an astonishing, unprecedented news event. It tops Nixon's corruption by a wide stretch if measured by the total harm done. Damage to national security is undoubtedly enormous, and the details of that damage are likely to be hidden from the public for years. There are still documents missing.

How do you handle such an unprecedented betrayal of the public trust? How do you cover a story about a former president being arrested on Espionage Act charges?

If you are The New York Times, you do this.


"MOMENTOUS SCENE IN MIAMI AS TRUMP PLEADS NOT GUILTY" is the headline, and it takes no imagination at all to imagine Donald Trump himself writing that out. The headline-important news is that Trump pleaded "NOT GUILTY," as if there was any damn question that he would do otherwise. The headline-important takeaway is that it was a "MOMENTOUS SCENE" as Trump pled not guilty, with "MOMENTOUS" being a word more often associated with headlines about war-ending victory parades, not a dozen-car motorcade threading through Miami to be met by perhaps a 100 gawking boosters and about as many members of the press.

All of it illustrated with a front-page picture that doesn't show the motorcade or crowd or arrest or any of it, but instead shows Trump stepping down from a flag-adorned plane that many or most observers might think is Air Force One. It's not, of course. It's Trump's private jet, and he painted it that way on purpose.

This is a newspaper front page that Donald Trump will hang on a Mar-a-Lago wall. It is the Truth Social version of events. The man attempted a coup, roused a crowd to attack the U.S. Capitol, and made off with some of the nation's most closely guarded secrets so that he could sort through them in Mar-a-Lago and in Bedminster at his leisure, and the actual New York Times believes the takeaway story to be the momentous scene of him pleading not guilty.

The alleged top editors in the country have to try very, very hard to be this bad at their jobs.
What would have been their second choice, if "Trump descending from Not Air Force One" had been unavailable? Would they have gone with him hugging a flag? Waving from a balcony?

While the Times attempts to convince us that the most important story of the day was the sheer spectacle of Trump being met with dozens of supporters as he walked into the courthouse to be booked, the more explicitly fascist media is looking to stir up political violence rather than abide by Trump being held accountable for actual federal crimes.


The Fox News board and executive suites really will not be happy until they have stoked mass domestic terrorism against Republicanism's enemies. From one hoax to the next, on and on, all of it meant to make their audience believe that America's elections are illegitimate, its democracy has already fallen, and that its elected government is tyrannical. A viewer could hardly come to any conclusion other than that violence was needed, with Fox News talking heads insisting that every nonviolent answer will only be swept aside by the supposed corruption of their enemies.

The man stole nuclear and national defense secrets and put them in a Mar-a-Lago bathroom, and the Times is agog at the visuals of it all while Fox believes charging him for doing it is evidence of incipient dictatorship. We are all seriously boned if this is the state of our so-called "press."
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thankfully I no longer subscribe to the New York Times. sarcasmo Jun 2023 #1
I hope people wrote to the New York Times to chew them out Marius25 Jun 2023 #2
NY Times motto: "All the news that's fit to distort" jaxexpat Jun 2023 #3
I'm going to disagree. It would have been "momentous" Ilsa Jun 2023 #4
Me too. Manufactured outrage IMHO Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #7
+1 onenote Jun 2023 #18
+2 and 3. manufactured outrage stopdiggin Jun 2023 #44
+4 ;) PXR-5 Jun 2023 #51
I agree. Did not understand the OP's outrage point, to the degree it required special attention msfiddlestix Jun 2023 #19
Agreed. TwilightZone Jun 2023 #23
I agree. I like the photo they chose bc it's for me an echo of him going down the escalator. Only... electric_blue68 Jun 2023 #52
Most of our media is controlled by and for conservatives. Lonestarblue Jun 2023 #5
Except that Glenn Greenwald used to write there BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #8
It's so odd how GG morphed... Pluvious Jun 2023 #28
What the Times did in 2016 was inexcusable . . . markpkessinger Jun 2023 #15
It's called "pot stirring". marybourg Jun 2023 #37
They had to "balance" after this BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #6
It's the media stupid. onecaliberal Jun 2023 #9
Yes, all 100% designed to minimize guilt/maximize electability. Hortensis Jun 2023 #10
I just canceled my subscription RainCaster Jun 2023 #11
My husband reads it LittleGirl Jun 2023 #12
It's not a "blunder". orthoclad Jun 2023 #13
Not fit for fishwrap spanone Jun 2023 #14
Gone! Jean Genie Jun 2023 #16
You're not the only one! calimary Jun 2023 #33
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2023 #17
It took 3 people to write that article MagickMuffin Jun 2023 #20
F'en unbelievable isn't it?? Oh wait - quite believable on second thought. NoMoreRepugs Jun 2023 #21
Don't ignore the flattering photo 617Blue Jun 2023 #22
THAT'S the problem. Right there. calimary Jun 2023 #26
When the fascists take over 617Blue Jun 2023 #29
Yep. Unfortunately true. calimary Jun 2023 #32
The only thing they and most other journalists DENVERPOPS Jun 2023 #34
+1 orangecrush Jun 2023 #30
This is so typical NYtimes. They have become nothing more than stenographers for Trump. Bev54 Jun 2023 #24
VERY SAD... Stuart G Jun 2023 #25
All I see is a big steaming turd, not a newspaper Blue Owl Jun 2023 #27
I honestly believe orangecrush Jun 2023 #31
Momentous fail IndyPepper Jun 2023 #35
I do not have any problem with the headline. I'm constantly amazed what people get their Raftergirl Jun 2023 #36
The problem is, some people only read headlines. SouthernDem4ever Jun 2023 #38
look at the overall depiction Skittles Jun 2023 #54
🙄 Raftergirl Jun 2023 #55
done here Skittles Jun 2023 #57
I am guilty. KentuckyWoman Jun 2023 #39
Don't judge this fine paper by one headline - they had many other damning ones and this editorial: Liberty Belle Jun 2023 #40
Honestly, I don't see even what's wrong with that headline. BlueCheeseAgain Jun 2023 #41
I have loathed NYT since their treatment of Clintons in the 90s and their support for Iraq War n/t CarlYasutomo Jun 2023 #42
Who knew the Grey Lady was such a shameless tart? Warpy Jun 2023 #43
I only read NYT when somebody posts it here on DU FakeNoose Jun 2023 #45
I'm puzzled by this thread. What would you expect them to publish??? LAS14 Jun 2023 #46
Personally I'm so grateful that we still have... LAS14 Jun 2023 #47
Shame on the NYT! That is just disgraceful. So glad I went w WAPO instead FlyingPiggy Jun 2023 #48
headline seems fine to me......... Takket Jun 2023 #49
What would your headline have been???? nt LAS14 Jun 2023 #50
No doubt you'll be receiving a response any time now... Abolishinist Jun 2023 #53
:-) LAS14 Jun 2023 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New York Times makes 'MOM...