Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ck4829

(36,238 posts)

1. And to think, I got some heat earlier for wanting to put jury nullification on the table

Reply to Groundhawg (Original post)

Mon Nov 11, 2024, 06:48 PM

Nov 11

Well, this has to be considered in light of this attack on the impartiality of the courts on top of the corruption of the Supreme Court. So I’m not asking, it should be used whenever you get the chance. It’s cool to nullify conservative laws.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

RandiFan1290

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I hope republicans don't pack the court even more. [View all] Groundhawg Nov 11 OP

And to think, I got some heat earlier for wanting to put jury nullification on the table ck4829 Nov 11 #1

and I hope that rain isn't wet RainCaster Nov 11 #2

Don't worry about it, they will. dem4decades Nov 11 #3

MAGA is shit and whatever shits on what is left of the good part of this nation, they will fucking shit on. SoFlaBro Nov 11 #4

Of course they will. megahertz Nov 11 #5

there are 47 federal court vacancies at the moment. Only 17 have pending nominations. onenote Nov 11 #6

I'm not ForgedCrank Nov 11 #7

Thomas and Alito Tickle Nov 11 #11

Well, I If i was a betting person bluestarone Nov 11 #8

Wait, isn't the idea that there should be 13 Supreme Court Justices, 1 for each federal circuit, still legitimate? nt kelly1mm Nov 11 #9

Alito will retire but not sure about Thomas vapor2 Nov 11 #10