General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rigged? Computer Security Experts Urge Harris To Demand Hand Recount [View all]RandomNumbers
(18,397 posts)1. Not illegal, but unusual. The purpose of having paper ballots is to be able to do a manual recount if the race is very close, or if there are anomalies in the tabulated numbers. The laws regarding who may request a recount under what circumstances will vary by state. Based on my understanding of the OP, there is a circumstance here where common sense would suggest that a recount of a few districts would be a wise precaution. ("Precaution" assumes that one is dedicated to uncovering fraud - or program glitches however they came to be - from any source.)
2. Probably not physically. The interesting question is this: if the tabulator recorded a vote that was not cast on paper, how was that done? Note that I work in information technology, so I could pose several theories about this. One might be double-counting of a particular ballot line for the hacker's preferred candidate. (Not that I would know how to do it, but black hat hackers can be very, very crafty.)
If the vote was cast on paper, a hand recount of the paper ballots would match the tabulator. The only fraud option I can think of that would yield the paper ballot, is there would be a very organized effort for fraudsters to cast votes for people who wouldn't show up in person. Note that this is a very difficult thing to achieve in a well-managed election. That is why there are actually VERY few cases of people perpetrating this kind of fraud. It wouldn't result in the kinds of numbers we are seeing.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):