Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The lesson is that "justice delayed is justice denied". [View all]ancianita
(38,768 posts)22. In my opinion, your opinion can't possibly know the actual evidence acquired by Jack Smith, because only in
pre-trial disclosure could the actual evidence have been known, and not necessarily what would have been selected out to use in the actual trial.
Reference to the laws and evidence have been in filings, but actual evidence? Only known precisely by the judge and defense but not publicly available pre-trial filing records.
That evidence will accompany the Jack Smith Final Report, likely in some appendices.
So no, even those interested in the report don't know the breadth and scope of the case that would have been prosecuted.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Laws are for the poor and middle class, not the wealthy. The rich will just use their $$$ to delay, delay, delay like
iluvtennis
Dec 1
#31
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court sits there, under the illusion they can fix it anytime they wish...
kentuck
Dec 1
#4
It sends a message to MAGA too. It was a witch hunt. There was never anything there.
Fish700
Dec 1
#5
Yeah we do. We know what he has said, we know what he did the last time he was in power.
Autumn
Dec 1
#24
"Special Counsel Jack Smith is due to release his report soon and it will be meaningless." Just your opinion, obviously
ancianita
Dec 1
#17
In my opinion, those that are interested in the report already know what is in the report...
kentuck
Dec 1
#19
In my opinion, your opinion can't possibly know the actual evidence acquired by Jack Smith, because only in
ancianita
Dec 1
#22
Do you think any evidence revealed now will change how trump's acolytes or the magats who control Congress react?
Scrivener7
Dec 1
#32
Yes. Enough to get some votes in the House and Senate from Republicans who face midterms in 2026.
ancianita
Dec 1
#36
I would have agreed two years ago. We the people still can't read the Mueller report
Evolve Dammit
Dec 1
#46
Evidence in the report will have an impact in current and future historical and legal circles. As truth should.
ancianita
Dec 1
#47
THIS !!! FACT NOT IN DISPUTE: Garland *COULD HAVE* assigned a SC to prosecute Benedict Donald the day after he ...
uponit7771
Dec 1
#29