Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Silent Type

(9,055 posts)
42. Here you go.
Sat Dec 7, 2024, 06:42 PM
Dec 2024

"Medicare Advantage insurers denied 3.4 million (7.4%) prior authorization requests in 2022. Of the 46.2 million prior authorization determinations in 2022, more than 90% (42.7 million) were fully favorable, meaning the requested item or service was approved in full.

Aug 8, 2024 Kaiser Foundation


From JAMA, published by AMA and essentially a physician union.

"Each year, millions of claims for medical services are denied by health insurance plans. Many denials may be justified as a necessary strategy to reduce wasteful spending from low-value care. However, denials may also delay diagnosis and/or treatment for patients, and appealing denials contributes to clinician workload and burnout.1 This tension is apparent in the Medicare program, where denials affect millions of beneficiaries who enroll in Medicare Advantage (MA). Although MA plans are required to cover the same services as traditional Medicare, these private plans are allowed to leverage utilization management tools, such as prior authorization, that traditional Medicare rarely uses.2 In 2021, MA plans denied approximately 6% of the 35 million prior authorization requests submitted. Although only 11% of these denials were appealed, the decisions were overturned in 82% of appealed cases.3 The regularity of reversals has raised questions about whether MA plans are deviating from their coverage obligations."
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2815743




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yep, UHC denies 1/3 of medical claims. Think. Again. Dec 2024 #1
No they don't and I'll bet money you can't provide a citation for that. I get you are are trying to justify shooting Silent Type Dec 2024 #4
From the OP article above... Think. Again. Dec 2024 #7
You accept every thing you read. That's initial denials AND requests for additional info. Silent Type Dec 2024 #14
I gave you a citation. Think. Again. Dec 2024 #18
If you provide a citation for ultimate denials, not initial ones quickly overturned I'll contribute $25 to your favorite Silent Type Dec 2024 #21
Man, those goal posts move FAST! Think. Again. Dec 2024 #24
You said they denied 30%, they don't. You left out the most important part about approving once lazy doctors Silent Type Dec 2024 #27
I said they denied 1/3 and the article this thread is about backs that up. Think. Again. Dec 2024 #31
Yes, but they did point out that you didn't provide it from the approved list of sources in their head ThreeNoSeep Dec 2024 #45
Just accept the fact that a corporation loyalties are to the executives and stock holders. The executives LiberalArkie Dec 2024 #63
After reading this thread, I'm starting to wonder and it damn sure isn't you..... chouchou Dec 2024 #90
Lazy doctors? yardwork Dec 2024 #70
Hmmmmm soldierant Dec 2024 #74
As the person happy feet Dec 2024 #102
UM happy feet Dec 2024 #105
In a lot of cases NJCher Dec 2024 #133
I love that you are willing to die on this hill being factually wrong and mildly abusive. ZonkerHarris Dec 2024 #155
LOL my thoughts too. Emile Dec 2024 #28
Why make... FeelingBlue Dec 2024 #48
Because they know many people Meowmee Dec 2024 #104
It's the New Yorker, typically they're a reliable source Arazi Dec 2024 #25
Does writer of article sound qualified. Her main article before was on "Britney Spears's conservatorship nightmare." Silent Type Dec 2024 #44
And who are you? Arazi Dec 2024 #57
Interesting that you don't see her qualifications the way I do. Ronan Farrow is an award-winning researcher/author... Hekate Dec 2024 #58
She sounds to be a very good writer. As is Ronan Farrow. That's for showing us how qualified Autumn Dec 2024 #73
In every post that you've made choie Dec 2024 #80
Disparaging the auther is an ad hominem fallacy. AZ8theist Dec 2024 #84
Jia appears on such podcasts as Preet Bahara's NJCher Dec 2024 #134
I am not impressed by this article. delisen Dec 2024 #153
Our healthcare system is terrible Henry203 Dec 2024 #43
No joke. It's time Congress gets of their rears. They've had 60 years to enact something decent, and haven't. Silent Type Dec 2024 #77
NEVER as long as Repukes are in the majority... AZ8theist Dec 2024 #89
I bet we couldn't get 85% of Democrats to vote for universal HC without private insurers involved. ACA Silent Type Dec 2024 #119
Yikes, where are you coming from with this attitude defending the undefensible? roscoeroscoe Dec 2024 #130
That last sentence boggles my mind NJCher Dec 2024 #137
Mrs. Thompson... is this you? intheflow Dec 2024 #131
That attack on another DUer is unjustified and really wrong. That data was posted earlier. hlthe2b Dec 2024 #9
Because it's the truth-- Silent Type Dec 2024 #17
Nol It is not. Multiple sources report the highest denials rate and further that they were using AI hlthe2b Dec 2024 #29
Not one of those says 30% ultimate denial rate. Silent Type Dec 2024 #38
That you keep changing to new strawman arguments is not working. It only shows you for hlthe2b Dec 2024 #41
Why are you splitting hairs on denials? intheflow Dec 2024 #132
Excellent gathering of sources Hekate Dec 2024 #64
Thank you. Think. Again. Dec 2024 #66
UHC lonely bird Dec 2024 #93
🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 ShazzieB Dec 2024 #99
Im glad it's happening. xmas74 Dec 2024 #111
I know what you mean! ShazzieB Dec 2024 #114
An article I read on DU yesterday Prof. Toru Tanaka Dec 2024 #10
Initial denials, final denials are like 9% and most are resolved quickly. Doctors do bill Botox for headaches when Silent Type Dec 2024 #19
I hope our case ends up as one of those in the 23%. Prof. Toru Tanaka Dec 2024 #23
Citation? SamuelTheThird Dec 2024 #37
Here you go. Silent Type Dec 2024 #42
That doesn't say UnitedHealthCare has a 9% denial rate SamuelTheThird Dec 2024 #46
Odd you use overall numbers dpibel Dec 2024 #47
There's also slipperiness in attributing initial denials to minor errors and "lazy doctors" Prairie Gates Dec 2024 #53
Even 9-10% denials seems horrific Arazi Dec 2024 #61
That's fantastic! OilemFirchen Dec 2024 #72
I work for insurance claims. I know how hard it is to push a totally valid claim thru with all the info LizBeth Dec 2024 #145
That was with the implications of algorithms. Then lets talk about implementing LizBeth Dec 2024 #146
And you keep equating talking about a shooting to Scrivener7 Dec 2024 #15
Yeah, in this context it is. Silent Type Dec 2024 #20
When multiple corporations practice legalized murder for profit, I guess you could say that Hekate Dec 2024 #71
In your opinion. ShazzieB Dec 2024 #100
See? Scrivener7 Dec 2024 #159
I think Forbes says an "estimated one-third denial rate Stargleamer Dec 2024 #36
That was rude. Justify shooting someone in the back? zuul Dec 2024 #56
No it's not 1/3, it's only 32% SocialDemocrat61 Dec 2024 #62
where are your citations/references that prove they don't deny claims at that rate? Genevra Dec 2024 #65
Hey! Are you with the parasitic insurance industry? Just curious. paleotn Dec 2024 #94
Would you please provide the source citing what percent they deny? nt Phoenix61 Dec 2024 #117
War is hell. The Grand Illuminist Dec 2024 #120
You are wrong. Blue Full Moon Dec 2024 #157
Here is a link. If you want more, do your own research. 33taw Dec 2024 #161
It's bad enough when trumpsters were the goons, it's another when Democrats join in. Silent Type Dec 2024 #2
Anyone not totally broken up a psychopathic ceo dies is a goon. SamuelTheThird Dec 2024 #49
Probably not, but they darn sure aren't what I expect from fellow Democrats. YMMV Silent Type Dec 2024 #50
I bet you would have said.... paleotn Dec 2024 #97
I don't visit some of the internet areas that supposedly are so "horrific" on the comments. That said, hlthe2b Dec 2024 #3
Just a "hard-working family man" the article says Prairie Gates Dec 2024 #8
. Think. Again. Dec 2024 #22
Just a "hard-working family man"? Must be whey he used AI to deny claims. Autumn Dec 2024 #76
Tony Soprano had more class nt xmas74 Dec 2024 #113
Just like so many other average white collar schlubs misanthrope Dec 2024 #118
Boo, fucking hoo atreides1 Dec 2024 #5
Guess the New Yorker caters to the NYC blue bloods. paleotn Dec 2024 #98
The New Yorker has done substantial reporting on Voltaire2 Dec 2024 #127
Laughing at evil people dying is generally normal. Pretending an evil man was good or deserving of sympathy, is not. ColinC Dec 2024 #6
Well said. Think. Again. Dec 2024 #11
indeed mike_c Dec 2024 #12
I freely confess that I sometimes watch videos Crunchy Frog Dec 2024 #33
Um, maybe in the movies... whathehell Dec 2024 #92
No? Saddam Hussein, Chris Dorner, Charles Manson, Hitler? ColinC Dec 2024 #101
This message was self-deleted by its author whathehell Dec 2024 #124
When huge insurance companies engage in causing economic disaster and even widescale deaths for profit Attilatheblond Dec 2024 #13
Yes Timewas Dec 2024 #91
A *mass murderer* was killed in cold blood Arazi Dec 2024 #16
I'm not laughing. City Lights Dec 2024 #26
I'm not laughing but I am thinking about Karma. kerry-is-my-prez Dec 2024 #30
Where Dem4life1234 Dec 2024 #32
HARD WORKING AT GETTING RICH ... Xoan Dec 2024 #34
From what I've seen most people are laughing at the BS demands for sympathy RockRaven Dec 2024 #35
Perhaps this sadistic trend could be ended by lining up all of the chortling trolls and shooting them in the back. OilemFirchen Dec 2024 #39
My concern is reserved for the people that died or suffered/ were bankrupted etc. Meowmee Dec 2024 #40
Laughing? Gloating? Aussie105 Dec 2024 #51
Considering the messages inscribed on those bullets Attilatheblond Dec 2024 #96
I'm not laughing, but I just don't feel pity for the person killed sakabatou Dec 2024 #52
We have become desensitised to the violent death of others. Aussie105 Dec 2024 #55
So let's say someone was murdered. sakabatou Dec 2024 #68
Yes. No. Maybe. Aussie105 Dec 2024 #75
Jia, you don't know me or anything about me - so how do you know if I'm laughing? hatrack Dec 2024 #54
I am against murder. sarisataka Dec 2024 #59
Applaud that we can still laugh delisen Dec 2024 #60
I'm a fan of gallows humor myself. ShazzieB Dec 2024 #108
Well said delisen Dec 2024 #112
Who says it was in cold blood? Jilly_in_VA Dec 2024 #67
Using that logic SCantiGOP Dec 2024 #88
Other articles I have read say that this ceo Linda ladeewolf Dec 2024 #69
We can't help it. Aussie105 Dec 2024 #79
Very true! Linda ladeewolf Dec 2024 #140
Less Than Zero Tears... Less Than Zero... MayReasonRule Dec 2024 #78
A Mark Twain quote appropriate here SnoopDog Dec 2024 #81
SnoopDog: Concur. FYI (unless Mr. Darrow borrowed it from Mr. Clemens) C0RI0LANUS Dec 2024 #144
It's a good saying no matter who said it... SnoopDog Dec 2024 #149
You're welcome and I follow that philosophy myself. C0RI0LANUS Dec 2024 #150
Knowing what Brian Thompson is infamous for, I honestly can't say that I have anymore sympathy for him than I had W T F Dec 2024 #82
I sent tots and pears, DJ Synikus Makisimus Dec 2024 #83
Yes, at this: SunSeeker Dec 2024 #85
We just witnessed the final nail in the coffin of democracy and the elite's are surprised we don't give a flying fuck yaesu Dec 2024 #86
Out loud? Swede Dec 2024 #87
Depends on the man, really. paleotn Dec 2024 #95
Fuck that guy orangecrush Dec 2024 #103
What has claudette Dec 2024 #106
Thompson murdered thousands of people- he just didn't leave fingerprints. hay rick Dec 2024 #107
TL;DR LuvLoogie Dec 2024 #109
You have not reported on the murders we haven't laughed st delisen Dec 2024 #110
WTAFH, new yorker??? The COMMENTS are more lawless than the actual niyad Dec 2024 #115
A plurality of Americans helped elect a convict to the Presidency. lees1975 Dec 2024 #116
and if that 40% NJCher Dec 2024 #143
Unfortunately, many are rejoicing at murder. Patton French Dec 2024 #121
It's despicable - anyone applauding or condoning the murder of someone operating within the bounds of the law had better Midwestern Democrat Dec 2024 #123
Well... LoveSucky Dec 2024 #122
There IS DiverDave Dec 2024 #125
Nobody is laughing. alarimer Dec 2024 #126
It's very sad. Patton French Dec 2024 #128
"UnitedHealth Group, a health-insurance conglomerate valued at five hundred and sixty billion dollars." Botany Dec 2024 #129
Predatory Capitalism kills people everywhere everyday. Emile Dec 2024 #135
yeah, I'm wondering where justice is coming from NJCher Dec 2024 #141
I'm old enough to remember when we were opposed to the death penalty. Patton French Dec 2024 #136
I'm still opposed to Predatory Capitalists killing people! Emile Dec 2024 #138
Indifference is met with indifference. EllieBC Dec 2024 #139
didn't he do NJCher Dec 2024 #142
Yes I believe he was being investigated? EllieBC Dec 2024 #158
I'm starting to LMAO every time it's mentioned The angst over this asshole being shot compared to the Autumn Dec 2024 #147
Justice, Vengeance, Karma, or a Combination of all Three? C0RI0LANUS Dec 2024 #148
No man is an island, Entire of itself, Ping Tung Dec 2024 #151
People Need to Shop for Bullet Proof Baseball Caps and Bullet Proof Clothes with Gloves Socks Oneear Dec 2024 #152
Oh fuck off Jia. Elitist clown. BannonsLiver Dec 2024 #154
... LexVegas Dec 2024 #156
I've heard of another 'New Yorker'----- "former" New Yorker I guess Jack Valentino Dec 2024 #160
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Yorker: A Man Was Mur...»Reply #42