Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court Says NO [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(160,475 posts)49. Donald Trump can be sentenced Friday in hush money case, Supreme Court says in 5-4 ruling
I am happy that trump is not above the law. The briefs filed by trump's counsel were really sad and ridiculous. Basically it was the position of trump and his attorneys that trump was totally above the law
Link to tweet
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/09/politics/supreme-court-donald-trump-sentencing
President-elect Donald Trump can be sentenced Friday in his New York hush money case, the Supreme Court said in a 5-4 ruling.
The high court on Thursday rejected Trumps emergency request to delay the proceeding, setting the stage for him to be sentenced just days before he is inaugurated on January 20 for a second term.
Four conservative justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh said they would have granted Trumps request. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the courts three liberals to side against Trump.
Judge Juan Merchan, the New York judge who oversaw Trumps trial, had ordered sentencing in the case for Friday morning but has signaled that Trump will face neither penalties nor prison time.
The sentencing hearing is scheduled for Friday at 9:30 a.m.
In a brief, one-paragraph statement, the court said that some of Trumps concerns could be handled in the ordinary course on appeal. The court also reasoned that the burden sentencing would impose on Trumps responsibilities is relatively insubstantial in light of the trial courts stated intent to impose no penalty.
The high court on Thursday rejected Trumps emergency request to delay the proceeding, setting the stage for him to be sentenced just days before he is inaugurated on January 20 for a second term.
Four conservative justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh said they would have granted Trumps request. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the courts three liberals to side against Trump.
Judge Juan Merchan, the New York judge who oversaw Trumps trial, had ordered sentencing in the case for Friday morning but has signaled that Trump will face neither penalties nor prison time.
The sentencing hearing is scheduled for Friday at 9:30 a.m.
In a brief, one-paragraph statement, the court said that some of Trumps concerns could be handled in the ordinary course on appeal. The court also reasoned that the burden sentencing would impose on Trumps responsibilities is relatively insubstantial in light of the trial courts stated intent to impose no penalty.
The fact that trump was so desperate to avoid being sentence makes me happy about this ruling
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Possibility because that Trump BS is causing more scrutiny of the court than Roberts can stand up to
Attilatheblond
Jan 10
#74
Maybe being in proximity to the vile male justices is making it easier for her to see the roots of many problems?
Attilatheblond
Jan 10
#75
Barrett is interesting. I expected Kavanaugh to be more of a rule of law guy though.
ColinC
Jan 9
#57
She seems fairly honest so far and not swayed by a ton of external interests quite yet.
ColinC
Jan 10
#79
Of course Alito should have recused himself but he is corrupt like the other GOPers.
Irish_Dem
Jan 10
#72
But get this. Though he's said otherwise, Judge Merchan still might NOT grant unconditional discharge.
ancianita
Jan 9
#28
Maybe it was vaguely mentioned? Shows how corporate media have ignored such negatives about their guys for a long time.
ancianita
Jan 9
#40
Imagine if a different (Democrat) First Lady had run over someone and killed them.
Teacher of the Year
Jan 10
#82
Let's imagine ourselves making more positive demands of our congress people and stop staring at the FOX trainwreck.
ancianita
Jan 10
#84
It's still a scary slim majority. Do the dissenting four explain themselves anywhere?
LAS14
Jan 9
#38
They lied under oath to get confirmed.I don't think they care about explaining themselves.
BComplex
Jan 9
#58
Donald Trump can be sentenced Friday in hush money case, Supreme Court says in 5-4 ruling
LetMyPeopleVote
Jan 9
#49