Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ScratchCat

(2,541 posts)
15. I agree, but what she did was this
Mon Jan 13, 2025, 01:45 PM
Jan 13

After reading the new order, it appears what she did was pretend that the January 6th case might have something in it about the other two defendants in the Documents case and made Smith tell her no such thing was in the J6 case. I suspect in any other scenario where there wasn't this rush before Trump is sworn in, the 11th Circuit would have squashed her claim that she could prevent the J6 case from being released and Smith wouldn't have had to jump through any hoops.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! Lunabell Jan 13 #1
How would she get in trouble? wnylib Jan 13 #6
Not necessarily. Lunabell Jan 13 #31
Federal judges are subjected to conduct review and censure? Polybius Jan 13 #33
Yes they are. Lunabell Jan 13 #34
But he can ignore a conduct review and appoint her wnylib Jan 13 #35
So? Lunabell Jan 13 #36
Huh? Just pointing out that, as much as I'd like to see Cannon wnylib Jan 14 #37
She has zero authority over the J6 report (vol I) and she knows it Prairie Gates Jan 13 #2
Is it the latest of deny, disparage, and delay, actually delaying any proceedings? That IS the plan. usaf-vet Jan 13 #8
garland can't drop the charges against waltine and carlos b/c then he might have to release vol. 2 and he certainly orleans Jan 13 #17
Biden with PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY can do whatever he wants. At least that is the way Trump will use it. Joe beat...... usaf-vet Jan 13 #24
If Biden doesn't release both 1 & 2 before Trump is sworn it SADLY it tell me he doesn't want VOL 2 released. Why Not! usaf-vet Jan 13 #28
biden absolutely SHOULD release the reports. asap! nt orleans Jan 13 #32
No SC for you! Kingofalldems Jan 13 #3
Now when is Trump sworn in as President? jalan48 Jan 13 #4
Yea but claudette Jan 13 #5
Garland said the report would be released as soon as the injunction expired Fiendish Thingy Jan 13 #10
I'll believe it claudette Jan 13 #11
Well, of course Fiendish Thingy Jan 13 #22
Correct malaise Jan 13 #12
now, would that "stay" be until 1/20 late in the afternoon? nt orleans Jan 13 #18
So far, no stay. Fiendish Thingy Jan 13 #23
Cannon had no jurisdiction to stall it in the first place. This whole episode of the "Cannon stay" is just Scrivener7 Jan 13 #7
I agree, but what she did was this ScratchCat Jan 13 #15
One that served Garland well. Escurumbele Jan 13 #16
K&R spanone Jan 13 #9
We've got him now!1! superpatriotman Jan 13 #13
What should happen but won't. Sneederbunk Jan 13 #14
She is not loyal. twodogsbarking Jan 13 #19
She will still be on the SCOTUS Botany Jan 13 #20
Garland is insane in giving a bblanket exclusion to moniss Jan 13 #21
Cannon rso Jan 13 #25
HELL HAS FROZEN OVER. LauraInLA Jan 13 #26
$10 says she'll have to explain her actions on Hannity tonight! Initech Jan 13 #27
i still dream of the guy in jail. i can dream cant i? AllaN01Bear Jan 13 #29
Someone put the fear of God in her. Joinfortmill Jan 13 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cannon denies Trump reque...»Reply #15