General Discussion

Blue Owl

(55,991 posts)

67. ESAD, NYT

Reply to edhopper (Original post)

Tue Feb 18, 2025, 01:14 AM

Feb 18

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

orleans

81 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fucking NY Times! [View all] edhopper Feb 17 OP

So, when we take back all three branches of government Aviation Pro Feb 17 #1

"...starve out the red states..." markodochartaigh Feb 17 #48

Or get their filthy hands on the money for themselves and Bluethroughu Feb 17 #58

Exactly. markodochartaigh Feb 17 #60

NY TIMES, IT'S CALLED BREAKING THE LAW! Bluethroughu Feb 17 #2

If "liberals" did what Trump is now doing, the NYT would compare them to Stalin, Mao or Jung Un. sop Feb 17 #8

Exactly! Bluethroughu Feb 17 #47

You are exactly correct! MacKasey Feb 17 #53

The difference being the Dems respect The Constitution. n/r John1956PA Feb 17 #3

A whole lot of really good ones, though: Ocelot II Feb 17 #4

Editorials are meaninless edhopper Feb 17 #13

Wait! What?!?! You're defending the NYT?!?! bif Feb 17 #24

Shame on me. Ocelot II Feb 17 #25

It's called gaslighting. 58Sunliner Feb 17 #27

All opinions. The hard news still flatters Trump in coverage and headlines.. Lonestarblue Feb 17 #26

"Liberal lawmakers have for years complained about bureaucracy that moved too slowly and rules that stifled sop Feb 17 #5

Liberals edhopper Feb 17 #15

Is it real or is it AI? cbabe Feb 17 #6

What does it matter edhopper Feb 17 #16

True. Wonder if a human editor reviewed or simply waved it by. cbabe Feb 17 #19

The byline edhopper Feb 17 #21

I'll agree with one thing... WarGamer Feb 17 #7

Yes! Cutting unnecessary spending in order to aid the programs you mention . . . John1956PA Feb 17 #11

Who wrote the above? Ty BootinUp Feb 17 #9

German Lopez edhopper Feb 17 #17

Link and author please AStern Feb 17 #10

German Lopez edhopper Feb 17 #18

Thank you AStern Feb 17 #46

Here's a link. It's in their email newsletter, not the main publication. Ocelot II Feb 17 #31

German Lopez is his name. . . DinahMoeHum Feb 17 #43

Haven't read the NYT in ages claudette Feb 17 #12

That "red tape" is the United States Constitution Martin Eden Feb 17 #14

I agree senseandsensibility Feb 17 #22

This! bronxiteforever Feb 17 #32

They are disgusting senseandsensibility Feb 17 #20

Liberal lawmakers have for years complained about bureaucracy? mzmolly Feb 17 #23

The article continues with quotes from Biden and Obama somsai Feb 17 #28

It takes time to actually get things done. mzmolly Feb 17 #34

slow legislation is one thing Skittles Feb 17 #61

Cut through the Constitution orangecrush Feb 17 #29

Yes, it's a pretty useless article. Ocelot II Feb 17 #30

Is there a newspaper we can depend on these days? Jilly_in_VA Feb 17 #33

The Guardian is good. nt spooky3 Feb 17 #49

I check The Guardian every day Jilly_in_VA Feb 17 #54

Same it seems like the world can see the criminal for what he is Dem4life1234 Feb 18 #72

The Guardian PhylliPretzel Feb 17 #50

Right on, cilla4progress Feb 17 #35

Is anyone writing a protest letter to the New York Times? calimary Feb 17 #36

That bureaucracy is called three branches of government Beck23 Feb 17 #37

Trump is a lawless criminal law-breaker. Liberals believe in following process. Baitball Blogger Feb 17 #38

CONServative tabloid paper. Emile Feb 17 #39

Brown Shirt Brown Nosing Fascists Waist Deep In Trump's Prolapsed Gaping Asshole MayReasonRule Feb 17 #40

Astonishingly off the mark. So easy to destroy and dismantle illegally and illegitimately what took years to build. Rs Pepsidog Feb 17 #41

Yes. TPTB (including MSM) want this to be about rules, authority, processes, conflicts between wiggs Feb 17 #42

Exactly senseandsensibility Feb 17 #59

Who writes their shit? Joinfortmill Feb 17 #44

NYET Times impressed by a Barbarossa Blitzkrieg? GreenWave Feb 17 #45

So crimes are ok if some people Progressive dog Feb 17 #51

We don't need no steenking Constitution! We're the New York Times! dchill Feb 17 #52

sure but the trains are finally running on time Voltaire2 Feb 17 #55

The day wouldn't be complete without a NYT rant. bif Feb 17 #56

Absolute trash! stillcool Feb 17 #57

Sick. They are intentionally boosting his "style". Passages Feb 17 #62

If only Merrick Garland .... kiri Feb 17 #63

It may not turn out to be so fast unless they ignore court orders - which might have consequences. soldierant Feb 17 #64

"Turd polishing" Six117 Feb 18 #65

Yeah, that's right you incredible twit. Mblaze Feb 18 #66

ESAD, NYT Blue Owl Feb 18 #67

I think, about 88 years ago, swong19104 Feb 18 #68

Yeah fu*k them Figarosmom Feb 18 #69

The idiots running the NYT these days need a basic lesson in Civics and the Constitution augyboston Feb 18 #70

wtf is wrong with these people? 4catsmom Feb 18 #71

Bullshit! We're supposed to "envy" Trump's total disregard for the constitution and the rule of law? Martin68 Feb 18 #73

I envy their ruthlessness in attaining power and how they use power when they have it. BannonsLiver Feb 18 #74

The problem is that ruthlessness requires lawlessness and unconstitutionality. Democracy is not based on ruthlessness. Martin68 Feb 18 #78

I don't agree with your point that being ruthless requires lawlessness. BannonsLiver Feb 18 #80

THE N Y TIMES, Like Most of the Other Mainstream Media, Is a Coward! Daleuhlmann Feb 18 #75

Wrong, assholes! We DO NOT approve of Trump's targets. There is no "may" here. Initech Feb 18 #76

Gardeners marvel at the speed at which lumberjacks prune trees. Wingus Dingus Feb 18 #77

I cancelled my NYT subscription back in 2016 after the NYT worked to elect trump LetMyPeopleVote Feb 18 #79

NY TIMES Editorial Sounds Like "Deja Vu All Over Again!" Daleuhlmann Feb 18 #81