General Discussion

questionseverything

(10,711 posts)

74. I went back and listened, he does not say "over a hundred years "

Wed Feb 19, 2025, 06:54 PM

Feb 19

In an off hand manner he says, “ a hundred years ago”

That’s 3/4 the way through the presentation before you could find something to nit pick

If there’s anything left when the evil one finishes, I want people to know, democracy didn’t fail us , we failed democracy

Out of hurry or laziness we gave up our right to oversee the vote count, we let nameless, faceless corporations take over the vote count and accepted whatever result the machine spit out

But a young cybersecurity expert gave up his job to try and show us the deal and in his presentation wasn’t precise enough for you?

Honestly we probably deserve what we get

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

88 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Former US Army statistician finds 2024 election win by Trump is off the charts improbable. [View all] magicarpet Feb 17 OP

I don't know how they did but they did Horse with no Name Feb 17 #1

I'm a white male. Sorry for existing. Doodley Feb 17 #34

Doodley, you have a great opportunity and challenge WhiteTara Feb 17 #44

Please don't patronize me or lecture me. I respect others, regardless of gender or skin color. Do you? Doodley Feb 17 #47

Doodley, your poor poor pitiful me WhiteTara Feb 17 #49

You know nothing about me other than I have said I am a white male. You have no idea what I have done to support women's Doodley Feb 17 #65

I'm not here to fight with you WhiteTara Feb 17 #66

I triggered you? Really? Bye. Doodley Feb 17 #67

Your "Sorry for existing" WhiteTara Feb 17 #68

This part of your Conservative Stand-Up? albabe Feb 17 #50

Manufactured grievances sure do add to his argument! KayossZero Feb 18 #71

Thought experiment: if white males were raptured, would the world be a better place? Sorry, but yes, it would. rainin Feb 21 #76

I don't accept stereotyping, including derogatory race or gender-based generalizations. Doodley Feb 21 #77

Is that your opinion of Pete Buttigieg, Tim Walz, or Gavin Newsom ? A cancer destroying the country ? MichMan Feb 21 #80

Thank you for saying so. There should be no place for hate speech that holds all white men accountable for Doodley Feb 21 #85

That's not how counterfactuals work EdmondDantes_ Feb 21 #82

Very good points against the demonization of folks, based race, gender, or even geography. Thank you. Doodley Feb 21 #84

" I don't know how they did but they did". I think musk had a hand in doing some computer wiz bang voodoo. mitch96 Feb 17 #38

The tabulation devices. Democrats had been so worried about touch screens that they totally forgot LiberalArkie Feb 17 #45

When did 1932 become 'over 100 years ago?" rzemanfl Feb 17 #2

Such a glaring error makes one question their conclusions sarisataka Feb 17 #5

That was my thought. n/t rzemanfl Feb 17 #40

lol at glaring error, you really had to deep dive to find something to "blast " questionseverything Feb 17 #52

92 years is nearly 100 years sarisataka Feb 17 #54

I guess he should of said, " a long time ago" questionseverything Feb 17 #55

I find it improbable sarisataka Feb 17 #56

But evidently not worth checking? Hand counting the votes? questionseverything Feb 17 #57

If it wasn't for those polls sarisataka Feb 17 #58

I'll play since it bumps the thread questionseverything Feb 17 #59

I did not know she would lose sarisataka Feb 17 #60

Precisely how was it tipping the wrong way? questionseverything Feb 17 #61

I am in Minnesota which is mostly blue sarisataka Feb 17 #63

It's hard not to talk about it when a candidate stops campaigning questionseverything Feb 17 #64

I went back and listened, he does not say "over a hundred years " questionseverything Feb 19 #74

Must be that new math Bettie Feb 17 #41

Trump projected about election interference for four years mtngirl47 Feb 17 #3

Rec malaise Feb 17 #4

returnee too returnee Mar 21 #86

Gore was robbed malaise Mar 21 #87

Yes... returnee Mar 21 #88

We'll keep looking for an explanation other than the fact that voters didn't like Democratic message in Nov. Silent Type Feb 17 #6

True, they did not like what we were selling.. I think it's gonna come back and bite them in the ass..nt mitch96 Feb 17 #39

2 ways Botany Feb 17 #7

Right. Data and logic reinforce each other. yellow dahlia Feb 17 #19

If the election results are legit, you are asking me to believe the following: ScratchCat Feb 17 #8

Swing state NC elected Democrats to the top offices, broke the Repuke supermajority in the legislature ms liberty Feb 17 #15

I agree on all points - and I like your style! dchill Feb 17 #20

Agreed. I had a similar of things that didn't make sense. yellow dahlia Feb 17 #22

Starlink was used to relay the election results so I've heard nattyice Feb 17 #9

You heard wrong. Totally debunked. Wiz Imp Feb 17 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author yellow dahlia Feb 17 #17

The INTERNET was used to relay election results.... reACTIONary Feb 17 #13

I've been saying this since November and have been phylny Feb 17 #10

Indeed. Many of us on this forum who have questioned the legitimacy of the election yellow dahlia Feb 17 #25

It's good to have a hobby Bonx Feb 17 #11

Even paranoid people have enemies. gab13by13 Feb 17 #32

Jeeze, not this shit again... reACTIONary Feb 17 #14

There have been many of us who questioned the 2024 election "results" yellow dahlia Feb 17 #16

"I don't need your votes" birdographer Feb 17 #23

These conspiracy theories do nobody any good unless someone can find absolute PROOF. groundloop Feb 17 #18

The only way to have "proof " is to hand count the votes under full public view questionseverything Feb 17 #48

I can't out of hand dismiss election tampering Cosmocat Feb 21 #81

One doesn't spend over 250 million dollars not to get results they wanted. Butterflylady Feb 17 #21

Exactly Andy823 Feb 17 #42

Not that impressed by this presentation but they should keep looking. nt Quixote1818 Feb 17 #24

It aligns with other data. yellow dahlia Feb 17 #27

That 88 Biden counties switched to trump is a huge red flag questionseverything Feb 17 #51

All of that red and yet... Hope22 Feb 17 #26

This message was self-deleted by its author lark Feb 17 #28

Even his little kid is smarter than that. Hope22 Feb 17 #31

More Eloon"s little kid X yapping about Daady helping trDRUMP win the election. magicarpet Feb 18 #70

What the hell is skylink? If you mean starlink, what you read was 100% wrong. Wiz Imp Feb 17 #36

This guy cracking a smiley smirk on introduction is all I need to see. Hope22 Feb 17 #29

Good to see the "smile " police are active questionseverything Feb 17 #53

It's OK. Don't hurt yourself. 😉 Hope22 Feb 17 #62

. BoRaGard Feb 17 #30

Sorry to jump on the conspiracy bandwagon but I don't think Trump won AStern Feb 17 #33

One of the worst arguments is that there is no way Trump could win all 7 swing states Wiz Imp Feb 17 #35

I don't agree with the premise of this thread atleast until someone produces proof standingtall Feb 17 #43

I don't care if people find it convincing or not, I'm just reporting the truth Wiz Imp Feb 17 #46

Swing states almost always move as a group. Mountainguy Feb 18 #69

I am not arguing for or against election cheating, but I know Trump would cheat if he could. But let me say that I live Doodley Feb 17 #37

He cheats at golf Mr.Bee Feb 18 #72

Upstanding businessman too,.. magicarpet Feb 18 #73

Kick ck4829 Feb 21 #75

If you look at past norms, it was the most unusual election of my lifetime MichMan Feb 21 #78

The sitting back and doing nothing part... Kid Berwyn Feb 21 #79

This is why you arrest and jail people who attempt coups ecstatic Feb 21 #83