Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
49. While technically a violation of the Logan Act, the letter and its 47 signatories have
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 08:50 AM
Mar 2015

committed an offense against the Constitution's principle of 'co-equal branches' and 'separation of powers.' As such, their offense is akin to the CIA staffers who spied on Feinstein's Select Senate Committee (probably also technically a violation of some obscure statute, but that's by-the-by).

Even if many Americans do not understand the principles of 'co-equal branches' and 'separation of powers,' it is vital to keep this in the media, in the hopes that enough will come to understand this to see the grave offense committed by the 47, an offense that, imo, transcends the petty confines of criminal statute (the Logan Act) and undermines the constitutional foundations of the Republic.

Lofty words, I know, but that's why the stakes are so high. The Constitution entrusts foreign policy to the Executive Branch, not the Legislative. And it does so for a reason (although my memory of the specific historical precedents has grown dim).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is a death spiral. cheyanne Mar 2015 #1
evidently it has already backfired on Paul. marym625 Mar 2015 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #2
nope marym625 Mar 2015 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #7
True marym625 Mar 2015 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #11
+1000 marym625 Mar 2015 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #14
Yeah, I know marym625 Mar 2015 #15
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #18
I know marym625 Mar 2015 #21
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #22
Sorry marym625 Mar 2015 #12
Prosecution depends on the law BainsBane Mar 2015 #3
from what I have read on some law reviews marym625 Mar 2015 #6
They didn't do shit about Iran-Contra nothing has changed. Rex Mar 2015 #35
fucked up it is marym625 Mar 2015 #37
Oh yeah you KNOW IT! That blew my mind! Rex Mar 2015 #39
yep. marym625 Mar 2015 #41
Tom Cotton should be drummed out of the Senate. CK_John Mar 2015 #8
I'm down with that marym625 Mar 2015 #10
47 Repubs signed the letter - Which 7 did not? missingfink Mar 2015 #16
They are marym625 Mar 2015 #19
I like what you said. Kath1 Mar 2015 #17
Thanks marym625 Mar 2015 #20
Yes, I do remember. Kath1 Mar 2015 #23
Thank you, Sister! marym625 Mar 2015 #24
You are quite welcome , sister! Kath1 Mar 2015 #26
ah! marym625 Mar 2015 #28
Pleae do so! Kath1 Mar 2015 #29
Kathy! marym625 Mar 2015 #30
Very cool! Kath1 Mar 2015 #32
Is there anyone here so effin' stupid... 99Forever Mar 2015 #25
I wonder how much someone is allowed to get away with marym625 Mar 2015 #27
The Bush Administration committed mass murder in my opinion. Kath1 Mar 2015 #31
The magical, elusive, words marym625 Mar 2015 #45
It seems with today's brand of national Democrat... 99Forever Mar 2015 #44
I'm sure they are scared beyond belief. marym625 Mar 2015 #46
Antisocial behavior unchecked, breeds more antisocial behavior. 99Forever Mar 2015 #47
Don't forget money grubbing marym625 Mar 2015 #48
I know Mary, it makes me ... 99Forever Mar 2015 #50
I don't think we ever disagree marym625 Mar 2015 #53
Oh sure, there would be a group on FR defending the Democratic party to the hilt. Rex Mar 2015 #36
I voted "We should keep it in the media" ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #33
I loved his response marym625 Mar 2015 #34
I voted none. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #38
I'm sorry but I disagree marym625 Mar 2015 #40
I just don't believe they acted illegally in this case and find it weird this is the thing TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #42
I agree with everything you said except the legality marym625 Mar 2015 #43
While technically a violation of the Logan Act, the letter and its 47 signatories have KingCharlemagne Mar 2015 #49
+1 marym625 Mar 2015 #54
Unfortunately as with anything... vi5 Mar 2015 #51
I think the "eventually" will be very soon marym625 Mar 2015 #55
I'd like to see Cotton prosecuted Chemisse Mar 2015 #52
That's a good angle marym625 Mar 2015 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll regarding the 47 idi...»Reply #49