UN seeks immunity for UNRWA employees complicit in Oct. 7 massacre - Channel 12 report

[moniss]

5. Something about this report from the JP is confusing.

Why would the UN be filing anything in a US Federal Court rather than at the ICC where the subject is being adjudicated? My comment isn't about the absurdity of the argument but rather the US courts have squat for any authority regarding some conduct by UN personnel in the Middle East. The only conceivable thing would be a suit brought by any American citizen affected by 10/7 so maybe that's it.

But I would correct the implication made by saying UNRWA is acknowledging "their complicity" because it appears to have been a handful out of the many thousands of personnel they have and the implication makes it sound like their involvement was some sort of plan by UNRWA management or controlled by them. If a half dozen people at Ford go out and beat up people and Ford verifies they worked there it is improper to then claim Ford is acknowledging being complicit.

Any time someone, some country or some group tries to shield a wanted international war criminal it is despicable. Including when it is Netanyahu and Gallant.