Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(44,924 posts)
9. I take your answer as being "no"
Wed Dec 11, 2024, 03:09 PM
Dec 11

Last edited Wed Dec 11, 2024, 04:57 PM - Edit history (1)

Here's a hint as to how this case isn't what you think it is --- NVIDIA was represented by Neal Katyal and the Respondent investors were represented by Deepak Gupta, both highly regarded lawyers whose names would come up in discussions of potential Biden Supreme Court nominees. And the judge that dissented in the ninth circuit -- arguing that NVIDIA's motion to dismiss should have been granted -- was a Biden court nominee.

The issues in this case were highly technical and ultimately not appropriate for Supreme Court review, which is why, during oral argument last month, both Justice Sotomayor and Justice Gorsuch essentially suggested the Court should never have taken up the case in the first place and allowed it to go to trial.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court Won't Decid...»Reply #9