Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Socialist Progressives
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]reACTIONary
(6,011 posts)113. You missed one....
- Winner rather than loser? Not progressive...... Oh,wait!
In order to be progressive you have to make progress. In order to make progress you have to win the election. In order to win the ekection, you have to win the primary . .... HRC looks like very progressive to me.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
191 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary doesn't evolve, she says whatever she thinks will get her more voters
mindwalker_i
Mar 2016
#84
She takes the position that helps the country best: She has had same principles forever
lewebley3
Mar 2016
#86
If Hillary's positions are that of a loyal dem then the party is sicker than I thought
All in it together
Mar 2016
#178
Got a link to justify your assertion? So far it does not look like it. Keep up the propaganda! n/t
xocet
Mar 2016
#136
Horrors! What you are describing will drastically reduce the standard of living for
JDPriestly
Mar 2016
#116
The trade agreements are aimed to destroy our democratic institutions and our
JDPriestly
Mar 2016
#132
Now that we have video, we must deal with "Who are you going to believe...
libdem4life
Mar 2016
#153
Outsourcing has too. When your phone rings and someone in the Philppines in on the other
JDPriestly
Mar 2016
#112
The thing is she has set he goal for $12 but what will be end up settling for?
LiberalArkie
Mar 2016
#18
And you'd have the same under Clinton due to cost of living adjustments to base of $12.
Hoyt
Mar 2016
#121
Here, Here, Me too. If your starting a list add me. Not that I would have any reason
A Simple Game
Mar 2016
#91
Thanks to M$M blackout of Bernie and his message (which I bet you yourself do not know)
Kip Humphrey
Mar 2016
#44
Thank you for putting together all this additional information together. Appreciated! /nt
think
Mar 2016
#53
She pushed for NAFTA, and for China's entry into the WTO, and for the TPP
Cheese Sandwich
Mar 2016
#10
Corporations will move jobs with or without these deals. There is no competition involved.
LonePirate
Mar 2016
#14
You're wrong to believe tariffs make up for reduced labor, supply chain and other production costs.
LonePirate
Mar 2016
#28
GATS Mode Four never caught on as they wanted it to, so now TiSA is in the pipeline
Baobab
Mar 2016
#71
Its all about free trade vs fair trade. It has never been fair trade. there needs to be a new law
litlbilly
Mar 2016
#32
Corporations will move jobs, but if we did not have the trade agreements, we would not
JDPriestly
Mar 2016
#124
Ask the OP. He's the one who said US workers were going after 50 cents and hour wages.
LonePirate
Mar 2016
#157
She served on the Board of WalMart. How's that work out for the workers? The owners?
jalan48
Mar 2016
#15
This post is just more Sanders propaganda: Hillary has worked for poor American's all her life
lewebley3
Mar 2016
#21
Blatantly false, and you've failed to prove a single claim in this thread. n/t
Nickel79
Mar 2016
#52
$15 per hour would be a reasonable raise for me and I could really use it!
Skeeter Barnes
Mar 2016
#77
$250k per hour is fine for Hill and Bill. $600k per year is fine for Chelsea. $15 per hour
Skeeter Barnes
Mar 2016
#72
Some people will slam me, I know. But I think HRC is going to have a tough time going
RKP5637
Mar 2016
#78
The DNC and DWS are in for a rude awaking in the 2016 GE. Millions of voters are PO'ed with the
RKP5637
Mar 2016
#105
this was Gordon Gekko's point--that raiding is not sustainable because it doesn't produce
MisterP
Mar 2016
#149
Frankly, this line of nonsense is getting sillier by the hour. If one were to spend an hour.,,
NNadir
Mar 2016
#101
It is a class war. Clinton has us shooting at each other. Everywhere she
whereisjustice
Mar 2016
#102
gonna have to tamp down on the Socialist Progressives Group cuz it's getting seen in Greatest List
tomm2thumbs
Mar 2016
#106
Of course she is. How could anybody who is paying attention not know this already?
debunction.junction
Mar 2016
#122
So it was only the "privileged people" that got the jobs in the Clinton years?
Algernon Moncrieff
Mar 2016
#163
careful...the HRC will flag this sort of article or block postings in the future.
Hulk
Mar 2016
#165