Minnesota

glinda

(14,807 posts)

8. Her appointment would be a devastating blow to protecting the environment and also animals. Her

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Mon Feb 15, 2016, 10:53 AM

Feb 2016

Last edited Mon Feb 15, 2016, 02:59 PM - Edit history (1)

Humane Society scorecard total is LOW. She was one of the first two co-sponsors to allow wolves to be shot again and since then they cannot put the genie back in the bottle. She continues to this day to talk favorably about her continued stance on wolves. She is on the Ag Committee and has been, as far as I can tell, a huge supporter of Monsanto and GE seeds, especially in regards to relations with Cuba which is known for having many organic farms.
Nope. I do not want her AT ALL on the Supreme Court. I want her here where we can keep an eye on her and hopefully replace her.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Some want Klobuchar to fill Scalia post. I doubt it [View all] question everything Feb 2016 OP

It would get her out of the Senate, The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2016 #1

i think she would be good choice n/t exalted circles Feb 2016 #2

Amy would be a great choice. Wellstone ruled Feb 2016 #3

I don't think Mark has any interest in returning to the Senate dflprincess Feb 2016 #4

So true,old Wendy really Wellstone ruled Feb 2016 #5

She loves Monsanto and wolf kills. Ya right...... glinda Feb 2016 #9

I'd be fine with that. Brickbat Feb 2016 #6

Sounds like a great idea. kickysnana Feb 2016 #7

Her appointment would be a devastating blow to protecting the environment and also animals. Her glinda Feb 2016 #8

Supreme Court justices are required to provide opinions... the_sly_pig Mar 2016 #10

But once she was on the court she'd be there until dies or retires dflprincess Apr 2016 #11