Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,900 posts)
21. Lots of ways
Sat Nov 24, 2012, 09:45 AM
Nov 2012

Back in the 80's they argued that women were being forced into porn. As evidence, they paraded around Linda Lovelace, who by most accounts was crazy as a shithouse rat. She claimed she was forced at gunpoint to do porn. Other porn actors and actresses said she was a freak who would do anything sexually, including bestiality. The very best they could claim was a case of consent being removed after the fact.

The argument hasn't changed much really. Now the big thing seems to be sex trafficking, and feminists claim that many (if not most) sex workers are being forced into it. The problem is that there's no shortage of women who want to work in the sex industry, and criminologists can't seem to find all these women they claim.

Ronald Weitzer, a criminologist at George Washington University and an expert on sex trafficking, said that trafficking is a hidden crime whose victims often fear coming forward. He said that might account for some of the disparity in the numbers, but only a small amount.

"The discrepancy between the alleged number of victims per year and the number of cases they've been able to make is so huge that it's got to raise major questions," Weitzer said. "It suggests that this problem is being blown way out of proportion."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/22/AR2007092201401_pf.html
Insisting that people follow your conclusions and ignore the data in front of them 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #1
Apparently stating these things in HoF is grounds for getting bounced Major Nikon Nov 2012 #2
I particularly think coming over here & simultaneously complaining Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #3
The truly funny part was I actually agreed with her somewhat Major Nikon Nov 2012 #4
She'll never know. Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #5
Ditto that.... I don't have anyone on ignore either... opiate69 Nov 2012 #6
I have a few on ignore Major Nikon Nov 2012 #8
Stop ignoring me and shut up when I talk to you! 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #13
Wait, I thought all sex on a porn set was in effect, rape? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2012 #7
Under the Patriarchy consent is not really possible 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #14
All very logical.. Upton Nov 2012 #9
It seems apparent that most new feminists subscribe to 3rd wave ideas Major Nikon Nov 2012 #10
It certainly appears that way.. Upton Nov 2012 #11
Here's the really sad part Major Nikon Nov 2012 #12
I suspect it's very.. well, maybe frustrating IS the right word. Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #15
Porn is not a crime, rape is. hrmjustin Nov 2012 #16
I've noticed that some folks are constitutionally incapable of arguing against consenting adult acts Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #17
i can not understand how they could argue they are the same. hrmjustin Nov 2012 #18
Lots of ways Major Nikon Nov 2012 #21
But, but, but... Major Nikon Nov 2012 #20
you could argue that porn provides a release and the multiple hook up sites loli phabay Nov 2012 #19
Apparently the problem with porn is 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #22
I found that mostly incoherent Major Nikon Nov 2012 #23
Mostly? 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #24
Just from a literary standpoint Major Nikon Nov 2012 #25
I would also add to this: opiate69 Nov 2012 #26
"Satanic ritual are rampant in the Metal industry" 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Conflating consenting adu...»Reply #21