Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)The 'rebound' effect of energy-efficient cars overplayed [View all]
http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=10473[font face=Serif][font size=5]The 'rebound' effect of energy-efficient cars overplayed[/font]
January 23, 2013
[font size=3]The argument that those who have fuel-efficient cars drive them more and hence use more energy is overplayed and inaccurate, a University of California, Davis, economist and his co-authors say in a comment article published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
Critics of energy efficiency programs in public policy debates have cited the rebound effect as a reason that hybrid cars and plug-in electric vehicles, for example, dont really save energy in the long run.
The backfire concept, a more extreme version of rebound, actually stems from a 19[font size="1"]th[/font] century analysis in a book titled The Coal Question, by Stanley Jevons. The book hypothesized that energy use rises as industry becomes more efficient because people produce and consume more goods, according to the Nature article. But the articles co-authors found that in the modern economy, the effect is not supported empirically.
If a technology is cheaper to run, people may use it more. If they dont, they can use their savings to buy other things that required energy to make. But evidence points to these effects being small too small to erase energy savings from energy efficiency standards, for example, said David S. Rapson, assistant professor of economics at UC Davis.
[/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/493475aJanuary 23, 2013
[font size=3]The argument that those who have fuel-efficient cars drive them more and hence use more energy is overplayed and inaccurate, a University of California, Davis, economist and his co-authors say in a comment article published Wednesday in the journal Nature.
Critics of energy efficiency programs in public policy debates have cited the rebound effect as a reason that hybrid cars and plug-in electric vehicles, for example, dont really save energy in the long run.
The backfire concept, a more extreme version of rebound, actually stems from a 19[font size="1"]th[/font] century analysis in a book titled The Coal Question, by Stanley Jevons. The book hypothesized that energy use rises as industry becomes more efficient because people produce and consume more goods, according to the Nature article. But the articles co-authors found that in the modern economy, the effect is not supported empirically.
If a technology is cheaper to run, people may use it more. If they dont, they can use their savings to buy other things that required energy to make. But evidence points to these effects being small too small to erase energy savings from energy efficiency standards, for example, said David S. Rapson, assistant professor of economics at UC Davis.
[/font][/font]
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

I guess we should try to make sure that any money savings from cheaper energy
limpyhobbler
Jan 2013
#1
True belivers in “Jevons’ Paradox” will tell you that such efforts would fail
OKIsItJustMe
Jan 2013
#2
It seems like more of an abstract philosophy question that a real world problem.
limpyhobbler
Jan 2013
#3
No energy has yet been conserved. In this example we just have more consumption
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#9
“The point of making things more efficient is to allow the whole system to keep growing.”
OKIsItJustMe
Jan 2013
#13