Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
11. It's a question of probabilities
Sun Dec 25, 2011, 12:15 PM
Dec 2011

A lot depends on how dire the situation becomes in any given place, but in general people who own land will be better off than those who don't. There are trade-offs to owning either suburban or rural land - rural settings give you more space but longer distances to travel and a more diffuse community. Suburban land is closer to places and people, but will be smaller and more subject to encroachment by opportunists.

In general things are probably going to come apart slower than some of us have feared - as you've seen - but land, skills and community are still the best insurance policy IMO.

In the event of a sudden global banking crash or a Zombie Apocalypse all bets are off, of course. In that case we'll all have to take our chances where we stand...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Peak Oil»The Peak Oil Crisis: 2012...»Reply #11