Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Tipping point. [View all]Human101948
(3,457 posts)13. Hard fact, if you have a gun in the home you are more likely to die a violent death...
Data from a US mortality follow-back survey were analyzed to determine whether having a firearm in the home increases the risk of a violent death in the home and whether risk varies by storage practice, type of gun, or number of guns in the home. Those persons with guns in the home were at greater risk than those without guns in the home of dying from a homicide in the home (adjusted odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.1, 3.4). They were also at greater risk of dying from a firearm homicide, but risk varied by age and whether the person was living with others at the time of death. The risk of dying from a suicide in the home was greater for males in homes with guns than for males without guns in the home (adjusted odds ratio = 10.4, 95% confidence interval: 5.8, 18.9). Persons with guns in the home were also more likely to have died from suicide committed with a firearm than from one committed by using a different method (adjusted odds ratio = 31.1, 95% confidence interval: 19.5, 49.6). Results show that regardless of storage practice, type of gun, or number of firearms in the home, having a gun in the home was associated with an increased risk of firearm homicide and firearm suicide in the home.
http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/160/10/929.full
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Great! How about liability on the part of any gun owner whose weapon is used to harm others?
Human101948
Jun 2016
#1
How about liability for the police and their employers who lose guns that are then used in crimes?
Human101948
Jun 2016
#2
Hard fact, if you have a gun in the home you are more likely to die a violent death...
Human101948
Jun 2016
#13
Straw colossus. Few in the pro-2A group here buy into Lott's theory. Note CDC findings.
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#32
If you are in a home equipped with electricity, you are more likely to be electrocuted.
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#27
"This is readly assisted by a Democratic Party which has junked any FDR/LBJ pretenses......"
pablo_marmol
Jul 2016
#38
If I can avoid a "hide," the Party pretty much gave up on a sound ideology for change...
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#41
Great idea. Strip citizens of the right to self-defense - pay any consequences.
pablo_marmol
Jul 2016
#39
I appreciate this post, as it strongly suggest a larger issue than gun control...
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#42